@U4x4A Hello there, how many cameras would you like to have? I cannot give an advice according to type of camera, but the general info about how to add the camera to Windy is here.

now I know where all the places with fires is

@Uedich That would be really nice and I would buy premium for that. But this is already a great update!

@Vuzz-0 The Drought map shows clearly Portugal ! So why argue ?

@Dmitry-Zujev nSv (nano Sievert) is a common unit used for radioactivity. Same as μSv or mSv. 1μSv = 1000 nSv

@Korina It would be nice to be able to set a truly black background for widgets.

@marekd Great !! This feature was expected on mobiles by many users for sea trips or flights. This is a big step forward.

I've been a premium subscriber for a while, even when the benefits were marginal to me, and I like Windy a lot. But, watch your premium segmentation with care, ventusky.com is free and addresses a number of models without ads [it appears to be something of a side project?]. Once people are more alert about it, segmenting certain features into Premium may be a bit pushing on a string. For what it's worth, the availability of hourly forecasting data with HRRR/NBM is why I suggest it to people not invested enough to pay for Windy to use Ventusky. So here's what keeps me paying for Windy without complaint: Higher resolution ECMWF The denser presentation of forecast data across hours and days More obscure map layers, like soil moisture Ventusky could fix #2, in many ways the mobile application and web site are a bit more polished than Windy, but perhaps some of the polish makes it difficult to make dense and functional presentation. They have a number of layers, so I think they could fix #3 in all practical respects for widening use cases in time. But with their side-project-ish (non) revenue, it seems unlikely they could approach #1, assuming high resolution ECMWF costs a decent amount of money. While I don't mean to suggest that Windy should be looking to "compete" with Ventusky for market share or anything like that, the choice of what to put behind premium and advertise as reasons to buy premium exists in equilibrium with other things available, and I guess I'm affectionate enough about Windy that I wanted to give my impression of reasons why I feel satisfied in continuing to pay for Premium, as I have for some time. Consider it a bit of unsolicited user or market research.

@Chris-Graham-3 Hi, we already have this layer Sea Temperature.

The display of satellite images by windy.com is very good, not only smooth, but also perfect in detail, which is a model for global meteorological departments to learn from. I would like to ask, what are the color schemes of the three displays (BLUE, VISIBLE, INFRA+) inside? Was it composited using "RGB"? Is there any relevant literature that can be referred to?

@przemo1986 Yes that's right, the previous INFRA layer has disappeared. Only INFRA+, now called IR in the mobile app, is shown with the colorised low temperatures of high cloud tops. What does the old infra red layer without color really was bringing?

@drjduncan I agreed it’s good for a farmer to prepare an advance

@Andrew-TM Hi, do you have any comparison with our radar and other source?

@Benjamin-Forg Please read - https://community.windy.com/topic/19271/windy-maps-merges-with-mapy-cz?_=1663584050410

@idefix37 Thank you, we will look at it.

@jeromeg52 Hello, HRRR is a model from a different provider, it does not make NAM obsolete in any way.

@rs401 Hello, I have already replied to your first post. Duplicating your posts will not get you a response faster and it is against our Community rules.

Bought premium because you showed AUS the love!

@bavabici