@Suty Hola! El sitio oficial en Argentina es https://www.smn.gob.ar/radar . Alí se pueden observar los distintos radares que actualmente se encuentran vigentes en el país. Sería de agrado que se incorporen los faltantes. Particularmente el que ha sido recientemente puesto en funcionamiento ubicado en la ciudad de San Carlos de Bolívar, Provincia de Buenos Aires. Muchas gracias!

Came on here to post about the radar snow icons as well. While I appreciate Windy’s efforts to add precipitation types, I find that the snow icons obscure the radar and generally make it difficult to read/use. As an example, when the radar shows only rain and no snow, the color gradients indicating precipitation intensity are very clear and easy to read. However, when there is snow, the snow icons are overlaid onto the precipitation and I find it more difficult to see the color gradients, how the storm is moving, etc. As a suggested solution, perhaps Windy could add settings for radar precipitation icons similar to the settings for wind particles animation? Ideally this would allow users to turn icons on/off and adjust icon size, opacity, and density. In any event, Windy rules and I’m looking forward to future updates!

Thank you, I got it.

@teemoer Hi, I’m also a user from mainland China, and I’ve noticed that access to Windy can be unstable at times. From my personal experience, the presence of sensitive country or region labels on the map alone can cause the page to be blocked or load very slowly, even though I only use Windy for weather information. If hiding or removing these labels could improve stability in mainland China, I would fully support that approach. Has the Windy team ever considered this option for users in regions with restricted internet access?

I find it comical how many people purchase/subscribe to Windy expecting what very well may be THE most requested feature on possibly EVERY single weather service. I did it. And boy howdy how disappointing. Has anyone at Windy ever taken a step or two back and considered that many (arguably MOST) of us are not full blown sanctioned meteorologists? How about (of the multitudes of layers available) adding one for us "Dummies" that's called- I don't know- "Forecast, FOR FUNSIES!" I'm sure this has been suggested or requested before. Don't waste your breath telling me I'm the only one. The granular control and layers are absolutely fabulous. I enjoy exploring the platform. I could spend a 40 hour week tinkering and I'm sure I would barely scratch the surface of Windy's capabilities. Unless I was looking for a simple forecast. Like we can get ANYWHERE, just with a boatload of ads. I am trying the "Rain, thunder" layer now and I am... underwhelmed. 14-ish day timeline? Cool! Where is the loop feature? Also, the whole argument posited earlier about the accuracy of predictions, or it "just being fiction," well- yeah? I suspect the average user knows that. We don't look at the news or Windy for that matter expecting an airtight guarantee that will hold water in a court of law. For crying out loud- it's right there in the name- "forecast," "prediction." Give us a break, geez. That is the weakest argument and so played out I'm not sure why you're even bothering. Thanks for all the other features, though! Wild app!

Hi, @nwm2518, thanks a lot for the camera source. I will pass it on to my colleagues who take care of them at Windy so that they can try to agree on cooperation with their owner. Have a wonderful day!

Hi all, I’d like to add my voice in support of adding the Garmin Instinct 2 among the devices supported by the Windy widget. I deliberately use the Instinct 2 specifically because of its mechanical durability and long battery life thanks to their MIP display technology. And it’s a real shame that these watches are still not supported by the Windy widget.

@apincik Hi, If you are interested in forecasts of fog, low stratus and temperature inversions, you can see the Fog layer of the ICON model and, for a given location, the Sounding forecast. [image: 1768560202192-4aeecafa-0ce5-47ba-aa69-2346fa858b2d.jpeg] In mountain it is best to use a high resolution model. Note that in the Satellite layer, if you set in the options “visible”, high clouds are white and blueish, low clouds are yellowish. [image: 1768563887553-a4d0442d-5abb-42f1-8ac4-fa37d4dea90d.jpeg]

@akbar-mahardhika Okay, thank you for your suggestion. I will share it with colleagues.

@moon.mooned492 As @idefix37 dexcribed, this 1 hour in the radar is the extrapolation of observed real data and even this 1 hour is sometimes difficult to provide upcoming real data. So anything longer would be absolutely useless in this case.

@Chuck-David Hello, could you please test this behavior in a private tab of the browser and let me know?

I have version 48.0.4(0193bf5ce). Build 2025-12-16, 17:13.

@UAHiker The model choice is important because they don’t have the same resolution. And don’t provide the same forecast. However, all three models providing Snow depth data for your location show a low depth. So you are right. Concerning New snow, it’s not possible to check what was the forecast yesterday. But the amount of snow forecast was probably underestimated.

@Adi-Galih Hello, there is an outage of data on the end of the provider. If you know any website with the data for this area, please let us know.

@sylvain-76 Hello, we are planning to offer this in 2026, there are some dependencies which must be done, but hopefully we will manage it.