<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with cycloneilse]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with cycloneilse]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/tags/cycloneilse</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 04:32:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/tags/cycloneilse.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Windy Premium info not accurate vs BOM (AU) Info]]></title><description><![CDATA[@idefix37 said in Windy Premium info not accurate vs BOM (AU) Info:

In the data provided by each RMSC, is the TC category provided at each future predicted postions? This information does not seem available in the data from the BOM.

I see it is not available in the public bulletin, but the feed we have from BoM directly does contain this information.
We'll definitely add more info about the data to HT interface soon-ish.
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/25121/windy-premium-info-not-accurate-vs-bom-au-info</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/25121/windy-premium-info-not-accurate-vs-bom-au-info</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Filip_K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>