After being delayed several times the RRFS is finally on NOMADS in the parallel feed as of August 12, 2026 with the 12 UTC run. At the same time, the RRFS prototype AWS bucket I shared earlier is no longer being updated. Hopefully will be on track for the full October 6, 2026 release and transition from NAM and HiresW. https://nomads.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/data/nccf/com/rrfs/para/ https://nomads.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/data/nccf/com/refs/para/

Hi @suty, after a lot more research, I was able to actually find some more models if the devs are interested. SMN-Arg Argentina WRF-SMN model: https://registry.opendata.aws/smn-ar-wrf-dataset/ Additional documentation here: https://odp-aws-smn.github.io/documentation_wrf_det/ IMS Israel has two models, the COSMO-IL and ICON-IL. The latter seems more interesting/useful to me: https://ims.gov.il/en/node/179

@mrothman It is not possible to see only a selected group of models in the “wind rose” chart. Here in Western Europe we have 7 models available and it is almost impossible to see all the arrows which are overlapping. It would also simplify the “Compare” big table. The best would be to be able to select the models in the table itself, because the choice could be different depending on the expected deadline or resolution.

@Alexander-Donskoy Hi, we can consider this change, however, it is not planned right now.

@Pgt and @guysAtWindy I would suggest to keep the new version of the app as a basis. I am sure, that there are many changes under the hood that are very positive and that we as users are not aware of. But seriously, the user interaction/experience needs to be fixed or needs to be made configurable: Old vs. new location selection process List vs. thumbnails for layers Auto-zoom behaviour Thank you and kind regards

@Dilees Very nice feature request. I also would love to see the option to show the raw, non-interpolated data.

@ysm65 I just want to ask why do you want to cancel your membership? I'm looking to upgrade my account.

@RobBurry This is probably still a future possibility https://community.windy.com/topic/17063/which-weather-model-for-japan-should-we-add-next?_=1664520897012

@idefix37 That's work fine, thank you.

@lou6977 Hello, as mentioned above, the MBLUE model has issues and does not work for certain parts of the day. More info at https://community.windy.com/topic/21609/meteoblue-temporarily-unavailable

@idefix37 @Alexisbrth64 Indeed, not all parameters are available with Arome 1.3km versus Arome 2.5km. We could debate if Windy could perhaps use the 2.5km in place of the 1.3km in order to get more parameters and mainly the altitude,...? Having said that, rain accumulation and snow are available with Arome 1.3km so why not with Windy ? https://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/arome.php?ech=3&mode=125&map=0