<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with models]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with models]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/tags/models</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 17:57:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/tags/models.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Upcoming US Model Changes]]></title><description><![CDATA[After being delayed several times the RRFS is finally on NOMADS in the parallel feed as of August 12, 2026 with the 12 UTC run. At the same time, the RRFS prototype AWS bucket I shared earlier is no longer being updated. Hopefully will be on track for the full October 6, 2026 release and transition from NAM and HiresW.
https://nomads.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/data/nccf/com/rrfs/para/
https://nomads.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/data/nccf/com/refs/para/
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/44247/upcoming-us-model-changes</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/44247/upcoming-us-model-changes</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheRadarGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Model Sources]]></title><description><![CDATA[Hi @suty, after a lot more research, I was able to actually find some more models if the devs are interested.
SMN-Arg Argentina WRF-SMN model: https://registry.opendata.aws/smn-ar-wrf-dataset/ Additional documentation here: https://odp-aws-smn.github.io/documentation_wrf_det/
IMS Israel has two models, the COSMO-IL and ICON-IL. The latter seems more interesting/useful to me: https://ims.gov.il/en/node/179
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/43061/new-model-sources</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/43061/new-model-sources</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheRadarGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How to see only a subset of models]]></title><description><![CDATA[@mrothman
It is not possible to see only a selected group of models in the “wind rose” chart.
Here in Western Europe we have 7 models available and it is almost impossible to see all the arrows which are overlapping.
It would also simplify the “Compare” big table.
The best would be to be able to select the models in the table itself, because the choice could be different depending on the expected deadline or resolution.
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/37031/how-to-see-only-a-subset-of-models</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/37031/how-to-see-only-a-subset-of-models</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ensemble Models for Windy (EPS, GEFS, MOGREPS, CEN, ALADIN, COSMO-LEPS, MPI-M, SREF, HREF...)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Re: <a href="/topic/33556/ensemble-models">Ensemble models</a><br />
There are several ensemble models that would be great to have access to.<br />
EPS, GEFS, MOGREPS, CEN, ALADIN, COSMO-LEPS, MPI-M, SREF, HREF...</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/36812/ensemble-models-for-windy-eps-gefs-mogreps-cen-aladin-cosmo-leps-mpi-m-sref-href</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/36812/ensemble-models-for-windy-eps-gefs-mogreps-cen-aladin-cosmo-leps-mpi-m-sref-href</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[spencer h]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Soundings, missing data]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">HI there,</p>
<p dir="auto">I like the soundings in Windy (aka Aerology). But I see that you use only a reduced dataset to draw the soundings. The temperature curve is always straight lines between data points from "standard" pressure levels like 950, 925, 900. 850, 800, 700, 600 hpa... So this can be rather inaccurate, especially in times and locations where you get some low level inversions.</p>
<p dir="auto">Isn't it possible to get a more high-res version of the soundings?</p>
<p dir="auto">By the way: Looking at the soundings from ICON-D2, the data points seem to be thinned out even more, just showing 1000, 950, 850 hpa levels in the lower part. Why? In this form the ICON D2 sounding is useless, because you will miss most of the low inversions that will form at this time of the year (autumn).</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/28972/soundings-missing-data</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/28972/soundings-missing-data</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[luglidz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Add wind guests to compare model]]></title><description><![CDATA[@Alexander-Donskoy Hi, we can consider this change, however, it is not planned right now.
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/28446/add-wind-guests-to-compare-model</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/28446/add-wind-guests-to-compare-model</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New windy interface]]></title><description><![CDATA[@Pgt and @guysAtWindy
I would suggest to keep the new version of the app as a basis. I am sure, that there are many changes under the hood that are very positive and that we as users are not aware of.
But seriously, the user interaction/experience needs to be fixed or needs to be made configurable:

Old vs. new location selection process
List vs. thumbnails for layers
Auto-zoom behaviour

Thank you and kind regards
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/28263/new-windy-interface</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/28263/new-windy-interface</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ftjwinfs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Enable&#x2F;Disable Model Interpolation]]></title><description><![CDATA[@Dilees
Very nice feature request. I also would love to see the option to show the raw, non-interpolated data.
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/27270/enable-disable-model-interpolation</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/27270/enable-disable-model-interpolation</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ftjwinfs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Windy premium]]></title><description><![CDATA[@ysm65 I just want to ask why do you want to cancel your membership? I'm looking to upgrade my account.
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/24061/windy-premium</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/24061/windy-premium</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suralarde]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Plans to get the JMA Models into Windy ?]]></title><description><![CDATA[@RobBurry
This is probably still a future possibility
https://community.windy.com/topic/17063/which-weather-model-for-japan-should-we-add-next?_=1664520897012
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/22469/plans-to-get-the-jma-models-into-windy</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/22469/plans-to-get-the-jma-models-into-windy</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Delayed weather models]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Update: 25.8.2022, 02:00 p.m. UTC</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">All forecast models are updated.</p>
<p dir="auto">Update: 25.8.2022, 8:00 a.m. UTC</p>
<p dir="auto">There is currently a delay for the majority of weather models due to syncing error, we are working on a fix.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/21860/delayed-weather-models</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/21860/delayed-weather-models</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Korina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Prévision modem used n’y default]]></title><description><![CDATA[@idefix37 That's work fine, thank you.
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/21637/prévision-modem-used-n-y-default</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/21637/prévision-modem-used-n-y-default</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[marc13 0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MBLUE &#x2F; Swiss Weather Model forecast stopped working]]></title><description><![CDATA[@lou6977 Hello, as mentioned above, the MBLUE model has issues and does not work for certain parts of the day. More info at https://community.windy.com/topic/21609/meteoblue-temporarily-unavailable
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/21605/mblue-swiss-weather-model-forecast-stopped-working</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/21605/mblue-swiss-weather-model-forecast-stopped-working</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Korina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The AROME model !]]></title><description><![CDATA[@idefix37
@Alexisbrth64
Indeed, not all parameters are available with Arome 1.3km versus Arome 2.5km. We could debate if Windy could perhaps use the 2.5km in place of the 1.3km in order to get more parameters and mainly the altitude,...?
Having said that, rain accumulation and snow are available with Arome 1.3km so why not with Windy ?
https://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/arome.php?ech=3&amp;mode=125&amp;map=0
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/15279/the-arome-model</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/15279/the-arome-model</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves70]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Difference in pressure?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello, Why is there a difference in pressure reported for Isiasis? Tropical Tidbits shows 985 off the coast of SC, but <a href="http://windy.com" rel="nofollow ugc">windy.com</a> shows 1004, including 1 hour forecast. Is this a big difference in pressure? Run: 06z Monday, Aug 03.</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="https://imgur.com/a/jAWYNjc" alt="imgur" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/13111/difference-in-pressure</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/topic/13111/difference-in-pressure</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlevoix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>