Windy Community
    • Unread
    • Categories
    • Groups
    • Go to windy.com
    • Register
    • Login

    Most accurate way to look at new snow

    General Discussion
    2
    5
    2.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H
      Homer1959
      last edited by

      Hello, what is the most reliable way to look at new snow ? If I look at the forecast for my location the total of the forecasted snow equal let say 15 cm over 24 hrs , so they may say .3cm at 3 then 1.5 at 6 than .9 at 9 and so on and the total will be 15cm. Now if I use the new snow icon with the picker for the same period they say 17.5 or else, the number are never or rarely the same ... why is that ? what is the most accurate number, the one under the picker or the one described in 3 hrs segment in the forecast ? Thanks !!

      idefix37I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • idefix37I
        idefix37 Sailor Moderator @Homer1959
        last edited by idefix37

        @Homer1959

        The detail of snowfalls forecast is interesting for knowing the intensity of precipitation. But the cumulation of snowfalls does not give an accurate measure of snow depth because the snow layer compacts by itself. When you select the Snow depth layer the weather picker shows at same time the snow depth and the snow density.
        So the Snow depth layer is theoretically more accurate than the total of snowfalls.

        https://community.windy.com/topic/10232/snowfall-history-map
        http://bit.ly/snow-depth-forecast-map

        H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          Homer1959 @idefix37
          last edited by

          @idefix37 Ok I think I got it , since english isnt my first language let see if I really got it : The snowfall forecast is telling me in theory the intensity of the snow fall EG, 1 cm per 3 hrs or 0.6 per 3 hrs etc etc , am I right ?

          Now if I use the picker with the NEW SNOW layer I'll get the approximative accumulation at the rate of 1mm of water for 1 cm of snw without taking into account the real density of the snow , am I right ?

          Finally , the SNOW DEPTH is the most realistic amount of snow that we will get ? Am I right ?

          Where I am not sure again is, if I look at the picker now for my location on Tuesday feb 18 it says, snow depth 42.8 cm according to the snow fall and the density of the snow determined by the model, so I am assuming that it is the total amount of snow and height we have received so far up to feb 18 this winter, am I right ?

          so for 18 hrs on the same day we are supposed to get according the the forecast apprx 13.9 cm so if I started the day with the snow depth picker at 42.8 and if I add 13.9 , the snow depth would be 56.7 by the end of the day on tuesday, but since the density of the snow vary, the snow depth layer picker is giving me 51.4 , so in reality the amount of snow received would be ( 51.4 - 42.8) 8.6 cm instead of the 13.9 shown in the forecast, am I right ? .... ok I have an headache, what about you ? :-) anyway thanks a million for your help Idefix

          idefix37I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • idefix37I
            idefix37 Sailor Moderator @Homer1959
            last edited by idefix37

            @Homer1959
            You are right. But don’t try to make precise calculation, because snowfall and snow depth are just rough estimation made by weather models. The figures are quite inaccurate if you are close to the rain-snow limit and in particular if you consider a location in mountains. The models resolution in mountainous areas it too coarse to give precise snow figures at each altitude levels.
            This is the reasons why I asked to Windy developers to forget the decimal precision for Snow depth. 43.8cm is ridiculous and 44cm would be enough precise.

            For example this morning the satellite picture over the Alps shows clearly the areas covered by snow:

            BEFF4C82-66ED-44A9-B0A5-F17EB7AA002D.jpeg

            Compare it with the Snow depth layer from ECMWF ....

            1AC6020A-E215-4B30-86B8-F9BE907EC01B.jpeg

            H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • H
              Homer1959 @idefix37
              last edited by

              @idefix37 Ok great thank you !!! There is always something to learn ...its a lot more complicated than The Weather Network but its more fun :-)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Windyty, S.E. - all rights reserved. Powered by excellent NodeBB
              NodeBB & contributors, OSM & contributors, HERE maps
              Terms of Use     Privacy Policy