<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Temperarture]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Temperature at Lugano</p>
<p dir="auto">hello !  why the temperature at Lugano (switzerland) not corrispond to reality : windy 20°C  realy 25°C  ?</p>
<p dir="auto">best regards<br />
Marcel<br />
<a href="http://www.fubax.ch" rel="nofollow ugc">www.fubax.ch</a><br />
arcel<br />
<a href="http://www.fubax.ch" rel="nofollow ugc">www.fubax.ch</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/12117/temperarture</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 14:33:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/12117.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2020 13:23:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Temperarture on Mon, 11 May 2020 11:33:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/korina" aria-label="Profile: Korina">@<bdi>Korina</bdi></a><br />
Thanks for your confirmation</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/46040</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/46040</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 11:33:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Temperarture on Mon, 11 May 2020 10:41:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/idefix37" aria-label="Profile: idefix37">@<bdi>idefix37</bdi></a> Hi, the default model is ECMWF, other models cannot be selected for embed.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/46036</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/46036</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Korina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 10:41:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Temperarture on Mon, 11 May 2020 06:48:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/volpino" aria-label="Profile: volpino">@<bdi>volpino</bdi></a><br />
On your website, I see an embedded Windy map. In this case I am not sure you can choose another model than ECMWF ??</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/46018</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/46018</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 06:48:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Temperarture on Sat, 09 May 2020 19:20:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/volpino" aria-label="Profile: volpino">@<bdi>volpino</bdi></a></p>
<p dir="auto">Hi Marcel,<br />
So you compare forecast temperature with your observation, but maybe you don’t use the best weather model for your location.<br />
To know which is the best one, select Reported temperature in low right corner of your screen.<br />
Then click on a weather station (the small bubbles) near your location. You get a comparison of forecast temperature with the observation at this weather station during last days. At bottom of the panel select the model which gives the best matching.<br />
Here we see that the ECMWF model does not give so good temperature forecasts:</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1589051994330-58ce7b51-9903-4ff2-86e9-b8e1247fba5b.jpeg" alt="58CE7B51-9903-4FF2-86E9-B8E1247FBA5B.jpeg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">Selecting Meteoblue you see that the curves match very well.<br />
So for temperature it could be a solution to choose Meteoblue in the Meteogram for temperature forecast.</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1589044987481-d0fc8d5e-9038-4896-a363-fd52b1e04a58.jpeg" alt="D0FC8D5E-9038-4896-A363-FD52B1E04A58.jpeg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">Try AROME too. In mountains high resolution models give better results.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/45921</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/45921</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2020 19:20:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Temperarture on Sat, 09 May 2020 17:56:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">As can be seen e.g. on the <a href="https://www.meteoblue.com/fr/meteo/prevision/multimodel/lugano_suisse_2659836" rel="nofollow ugc">MeteoBlue site</a> (screenshot below), temperature values of different weather forecast models are quite scattered (differences up to 10°C).</p>
<p dir="auto">This is due to the accuracy and spatial resolution of each model, as well as to the difficulty of computing a good forecast over a region like yours, surrounded by mountains, valleys and a big lake in the middle...</p>
<p dir="auto">Did you tried to compare the <em>"real"</em> temperature with the most local and trusted forecast office (e.g. <a href="https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/home.html?tab=temperature" rel="nofollow ugc">meteoswiss</a>)?</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1589040335180-titi.jpg" alt="titi.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/45913</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/45913</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[vsinceac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2020 17:56:10 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>