<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1612981257092-screen-shot-2021-02-10-at-12.17.22-pm-resized.jpg" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-10 at 12.17.22 PM.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">It's clear that there <em>is</em> data here, it's just not being displayed.</p>
<p dir="auto">Refreshing the page doesn't help. I don't see anything obviously relevant in the web console.</p>
<p dir="auto">this also happens in the mobile app: <img src="/assets/uploads/files/1612981447128-signal-2021-02-10-122347.jpeg" alt="signal-2021-02-10-122347.jpeg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">in some cases it's just slightly annoying, but my brain can reconstruct the missing pieces. In others, it looks like there's probably a huge chunk missing, compared to what appears in the Low Clouds layer.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/15405/cloud-bases-layer-sometimes-missing-large-chunks-of-coverage</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 15:13:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/15405.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:25:16 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Mon, 03 Jul 2023 14:34:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jeremm" aria-label="Profile: Jeremm">@<bdi>Jeremm</bdi></a> Cloud base is one of the parameters from ECMWF-HRES model that windy just imports and displays. No tweaking is done and thus no threshold can be changed. See <a href="https://codes.ecmwf.int/grib/param-db/?id=260109" rel="nofollow ugc">parameter description</a> for more info</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/149586</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/149586</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Filip_K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 14:34:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Mon, 03 Jul 2023 14:12:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/korina" aria-label="Profile: Korina">@<bdi>Korina</bdi></a> Hello, I would like to second Diddi's proposition.<br />
I talked to some fellow pilots (helicopter pilots in Canada), and we are all a bit puzzled by this missing chunks. Maybe a tick box to turn off and on the 50% threshold ?</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/149585</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/149585</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 14:12:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Wed, 07 Dec 2022 09:46:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/diddi-oskarsson" aria-label="Profile: Diddi-Oskarsson">@<bdi>Diddi-Oskarsson</bdi></a> We cannot tell an approximate timeline of implementation at the moment.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/127767</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/127767</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Korina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 09:46:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Tue, 06 Dec 2022 14:37:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/korina" aria-label="Profile: Korina">@<bdi>Korina</bdi></a> It's been almost a year since last post. Are you still considering this?</p>
<p dir="auto">I'd say this is a rather big limitation in Windy right now as the cloud base map is not very helpful when planning VFR flights. 49% coverage and cloud base at 500ft is a big deal and I want to be able to see this. Please add a slider or setting where we can choose ourselves which cloud coverage percentage should be visible.</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/127704</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/127704</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Diddi Oskarsson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 14:37:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:14:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/petergaultney" aria-label="Profile: petergaultney">@<bdi>petergaultney</bdi></a> We will consider it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/97123</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/97123</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Korina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:14:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:21:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/korina" aria-label="Profile: korina">@<bdi>korina</bdi></a> just to be clear, the 50% threshold explains the appearance, but the choice to hide the full cloud bases data in that way is very un-ideal for pilots. Just because it's technically scattered instead of broken doesn't suddenly make it safe for me to plan an VFR flight at that altitude.</p>
<p dir="auto">I understand it probably doesn't make sense to change an existing visualisation just for pilots, but a new visualization option would be extremely helpful - it's probably the main thing that Windy can't really help a pilot with at this point in time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/96918</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/96918</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[petergaultney]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:21:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:27:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/deszkrobert" aria-label="Profile: deszkrobert">@<bdi>deszkrobert</bdi></a> Hello, layer Cloud base has a 50% threshold for displaying clouds. It is the lowest cloud layer that exceeds 50% of the sky coverage. The full description can be found at <a href="https://confluence.ecmwf.int/display/FCST/43r1+new+parameters%3A+Ceiling" rel="nofollow ugc">https://confluence.ecmwf.int/display/FCST/43r1+new+parameters%3A+Ceiling</a>.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/94666</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/94666</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Korina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:27:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:50:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The issue still exists, as of December 2021. It appears way too often, and it's somewhat annoying as proper visualisation of cloud base is extremely important for flight preparation...</p>
<p dir="auto">I don't believe cloud base value suddenly cuts along a straight line...<br />
So is this going to be improved, or we have to live with it?</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1639493188133-windy.jpg" alt="windy.JPG" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't know if it makes any difference, but tried with different graphic acceleration settings, under Chrome, no changes...</p>
<p dir="auto">Any answer for even a slight improvement is appreciated!</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/94606</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/94606</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[deszkrobert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:50:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:50:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gkikas-lgpz" aria-label="Profile: gkikas-lgpz">@<bdi>gkikas-lgpz</bdi></a> That's helpful context.</p>
<p dir="auto">It would be ideal for me if this view could show the bases of the clouds rather than the okta-related ceilings. If I have OVC at 700 at Enterprise, there's no way I'm going flying over over Ozark even if it's technically SCT, because those same clouds are likely sitting near 700 anyway.</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm sure for others this is perfect for them. I wonder how much effort would be involved in making Cloud bases display bases while adding a new Ceilings display with these block-by-block estimates of the cloud coverage. Personally, even splitting those into two separate overlays would work - cloud bases and cloud coverage are two separately interesting things.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/70632</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/70632</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[petergaultney]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:50:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Thu, 11 Feb 2021 07:46:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/petergaultney" aria-label="Profile: petergaultney">@<bdi>petergaultney</bdi></a><br />
Cloud bases map, depicts the parameter "ceiling".<br />
It gives the height above the level of the model orography,<br />
of the base of the lowest cloud layer<br />
covering more than 50% of the sky (more than 4 oktas).<br />
<a href="https://confluence.ecmwf.int//display/FCST/43r1+new+parameters%3A+Ceiling" rel="nofollow ugc">https://confluence.ecmwf.int//display/FCST/43r1+new+parameters%3A+Ceiling</a></p>
<p dir="auto">So, in areas with cloud cover less than 50%,<br />
cloud base (ceiling) is not depicted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/70557</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/70557</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gkikas LGPZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 07:46:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:36:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1613010948763-screen-shot-2021-02-10-at-8.34.45-pm-resized.jpg" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-10 at 8.34.45 PM.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /> <img src="/assets/uploads/files/1613010955181-screen-shot-2021-02-10-at-8.34.39-pm-resized.jpg" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-10 at 8.34.39 PM.jpg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/70546</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/70546</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[petergaultney]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:36:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:31:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/idefix37" aria-label="Profile: idefix37">@<bdi>idefix37</bdi></a> I don't mean to be rude, but it seems clear to me that you didn't look at my screenshots. Taking a look just at the mobile app:</p>
<p dir="auto">Look east and south of Memphis. There are obvious missing squares in that cloud front.</p>
<p dir="auto">Look south of Lexington. There are obvious missing squares in the south east of KY.</p>
<p dir="auto">Look at the A in South Carolina. Clearly missing data, not a lack of clouds.</p>
<p dir="auto">Same thing with northern Florida. Also near New Orleans and out over the Gulf of Mexico.</p>
<p dir="auto">In all of these places, there aren't "no clouds". There are definitely clouds, and for some reason the data isn't displaying them.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/70545</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/70545</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[petergaultney]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 02:31:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cloud bases layer sometimes missing large chunks of coverage on Wed, 10 Feb 2021 20:03:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/petergaultney" aria-label="Profile: petergaultney">@<bdi>petergaultney</bdi></a><br />
Where there are no clouds, there is no cloud base...</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1612986876004-6ea71655-5571-41bc-90bb-76f3d58cb588-resized.jpeg" alt="6EA71655-5571-41BC-90BB-76F3D58CB588.jpeg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">So nothing is missing on your cloud base layer.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/70527</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/70527</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 20:03:09 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>