<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Boundary layer thickness - soaring height potential]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">HI There any chance you could add a boundary layer thickness - soaring height potential for each model<br />
For ICON this might be :<br />
HTOP_DC Height of top of dry convection above MSL (maybe minus elevation)<br />
in ECMWF this is<br />
BLH boundary layer height.<br />
in GFS this could be<br />
MIXHT mixed layer height</p>
<p dir="auto">None are perfect but from a soaring perspective each would give an indication of the area with the best soaring potential if other factors also line up.</p>
<p dir="auto">Simon</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/15757/boundary-layer-thickness-soaring-height-potential</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 16:56:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/15757.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:14:34 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boundary layer thickness - soaring height potential on Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:24:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/kommandorkeen" aria-label="Profile: kommandorkeen">@<bdi>kommandorkeen</bdi></a> Hi, we will think about that, thank you!</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/72550</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/72550</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Korina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:24:43 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>