Windy Community
    • Unread
    • Categories
    • Groups
    • Go to windy.com
    • Register
    • Login

    Windy.com introduces soaring forecast

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
    article
    205 Posts 132 Posters 286.6k Views 30 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ? Offline
      A Former User
      last edited by

      Hi. Great idea about thermals but need much more info for paragliders and sail planes. Will be niece if t-skew drawings or sounding will be better quality. Some glider pilots they can read and relay on this form of information's. Basically all info which is included in dr. Jack RASP blip map forecast is very helpful. As a active paraglider pilot more often I look on Windy forecast because of presents fresh data (wind directions and strength) is on one page. Now are included thermals parameters and this is great.
      Regards for all Windy team.

      Pawel

      chrabC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • redbaronessR Offline
        redbaroness
        last edited by redbaroness

        I LOVE the thermals forecast! So far it seems to be more accurate than others I've used, and it's easy to use, simple, and part of an overall experience that is done really well.
        Dr Jack's has more details but it does a poor job near the coastline with sea breeze effects. Overall this is great.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • dgwilliams4D Offline
          dgwilliams4 | Premium
          last edited by

          Excellent work! As a paraglider pilot (and premium user), it's wonderful to see such dedication to the soaring communities! Keep up the great work!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • prepondP Offline
            prepond @Korina | Premium
            last edited by

            @korina if it is possible, please put there information about climb rate in m/s, would it be possible?

            marcos2795M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
            • Rolle247R Offline
              Rolle247 | Premium
              last edited by

              Theres no thermal welosity...strenght of thermals... thats what all other thermalssites have...

              KorinaK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • J Offline
                JonasBoll
                last edited by

                I really appreciate the thermal forecast. It seems to be fairly accurate and lets me know when I should skip a day of work and go soaring.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • KorinaK Offline
                  Korina @Rolle247
                  last edited by

                  @rolle247 Hi, we value your feedback. We will try to improve thermals overall.

                  Korina

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • jakubvranaJ Offline
                    jakubvrana | Premium
                    last edited by

                    This layer is extremely over-optimistic. It predicts heights for 1000 m or more higher than they are predicted by other methods (and then they really are). Take a look at the screenshot: The Thermals layer predicts 3200 m (which is extremely rare in Czechia) whereas it will actually be around 1890 m (as predicted by another method).

                    cf57f7e0-6660-4102-9252-911194006a6c-image.png

                    The method used by my plugin has its “proof” in the diagram:

                    meteogram.png

                    I have no idea how the number coming from the Thermals layer is computed but it's most certainly wrong.

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                    • EduardoSGE Offline
                      EduardoSG | Premium
                      last edited by EduardoSG

                      Hi,Korina,
                      Excellent addition.
                      I post an image and some analysis to check and compare
                      If I understand correctly, the clouds to the upper left, indicate dense cumulus clouds in the area
                      Then all the area surrounding it, indicates overcast conditions (striped ) as well as upper right corner
                      All the grey area is no thermals (water)
                      And the area in the center with varying degrees of white-yellowish colour, indicates thermals with no cumulus, with 800 mts top of thermal in the selected point
                      However when I look at the Sounding, my interpretation of the sounding is of a somewhat dense stratocumulus clouds layer, with lower cloud base that those 800 mts (by the way, I moved the ticker just in the same spot of the sounding after loading the image and it still shows 800 mts)
                      Would like to see if there are differences in the way we interpret the soundings, or just something that can be improved in the Thermals Layer
                      windy-comprimido.jpg
                      I could not upload a higher resolution picture, but I keep it in case you need it and can be sent via mail or other

                      KorinaK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • paragliderP Offline
                        paraglider | Premium
                        last edited by

                        Thanks for adding the thermal forecast, Im sure it will be appreciated by all pilots.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • bcrosbyB Offline
                          bcrosby | Premium
                          last edited by

                          Can this new product be used to predict turbulent areas for VFR Flying?

                          In other words: I need to climb "higher" than the thermal tops to have a smooth ride. OR Avoid the area all together if I need to stay at a specific altitude to keep the ride smooth.

                          I'm assuming that this data is based on daytime heating and convective rising of air?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • V Offline
                            vidulisico | Premium
                            last edited by

                            Termals height over day would be fine too. And with termal strength :-)
                            This could be an meteogram addition.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • 4_Achtel4 Offline
                              4_Achtel | Premium
                              last edited by

                              Excellent feature well done. To make it more usable for me I improved the resolution by choosing a more differentiated color scheme. The image includes wind information but not clear at which altitude. I assume ground level ?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • chrabC Offline
                                chrab @Guest | Premium
                                last edited by

                                @dziubdzius Try plugin sounding:
                                https://www.windy.com/plugins

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • marcos2795M Offline
                                  marcos2795 @prepond | Premium
                                  last edited by

                                  @prepond yes please!!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • guy_bottlaenderG Offline
                                    guy_bottlaender @Korina | Premium
                                    last edited by

                                    @korina AROME will be much more accurate for W Europe... altitude fields are available in many places, is there a way to improve in that way?

                                    idefix37I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • idefix37I Offline
                                      idefix37 Sailor Moderator @guy_bottlaender
                                      last edited by

                                      @guy_bottlaender
                                      Windy uses the 1.3km version of AROME and this version does not provide altitude parameters, only the 2.5km version offers such parameters.

                                      guy_bottlaenderG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • Z Offline
                                        zzzzzzxxx
                                        last edited by

                                        Понятно, спасибо

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • I Offline
                                          Ingebjorn | Premium
                                          last edited by

                                          Thanks for this upgrade - really looking forward to test it now in the middle of the gliding season. Would also be nice if in the future a prognosis of thermal strength is indicated.

                                          KorinaK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • KorinaK Offline
                                            Korina @Ingebjorn
                                            last edited by

                                            @ingebjorn @bcrosby @Avolar1 @EduardoSG @DiscoverPG Hi, with the new update, Thermals are now also available for NAM model.

                                            Korina

                                            CirrusC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Windy Community  |  Powered by excellent NodeBB
                                            Terms of Use     Privacy Policy     Windy.com