-
I use the ECMWF most of the time but occasionally compare it to the GFS one here n the southwest USA.
-
ECMWF works well on Madeira island and in my region in Poland. But I quite often use the "compare" feature and hope for the nicest forecast to come true :-)
-
@Korina Mostly the ECMWF
-
I mostly use the Icon-D2 because it seems to be the most accurate wheater model for my region.
-
For Central Europe I use ICON and ECMWF models most.
-
Do you have compare model forecast for Indian subcontinent?
-
Mostly use the ICOn
-
Too fast with my first post,
CAPE index is a major improvement. Use mainly the short term forecast features, scope 1-3 h, rain radar, wind above ground etc. Are out with dogs in the forests with a search and rescue team, so before training I can plan and prepare on exposure. -
I use Windy for motorcycle racing and so far I got the best short-term results from the ICON-D2 ...
-
Depends on the region and purpose. Bot overall probably good ol' ECMWF :)
-
I use GFS and sometime ICON
-
@Korina I use ECMWF
-
@Korina ecmwf North of italy
-
@Korina My go to is ECMWF
-
@Korina I am using mostly ECMWF model in the south east of Poland but ICON-D2 is also good on the west of Poland....
-
I use ECMWF. It seems to be the most accurate for my location and needs
-
For long range (above 3 days) the GFS seems to work best. Switching to ECMWF for 2-3 day forecast, as it offers better precision. ICON models just for comparison.
Based on East coast Baltic sea, main usage wind, waves and cloud cover.
-
I use ECMWF simply because it gives me very reliable results. I originally chose it because it uses the highest resolution, but I keep it because it delivers. I have fiddled a bit with the other models, especially with the help of the model comparison tool, but ECMWF generally matches best with what I see out my window.
-
Mostly.using ECMWF, but ICON-D2 is also quite useful in Berlin, Germany
-
@Korina mostly I use ECMWF in combination with ICON, suits me best
Windy Community | Powered by excellent
NodeBB