-
ECMWF model all the way for Great Lakes
-
@Korina Nova Scotia here: ECMWF and GFS
-
@Korina I have a tendency just to look up, look around and make my own forecast 😜
-
El Modelo de mayor acertividad en el ECMWF y le realizo la comparacion con el GFS para poder tener una claridad de una mayor probabilidad de precipitaciones, fortaleciendolo con el ICON.
-
Hello :)
I mostly compare ECMWF to MBLUE. I found that they are most accurate for my region which is Bulgaria. ECMWF is more correct for rain prediction for me. But for long term MBLUE gives me a reliable forecast.
Thank you
-
@Korina one hundred percent windy is the best forecast!
-
@Korina I like the detail in HRRR
-
I use MBLUE mostly as it seems to be more accurate in West Sussex UK for temperature, rain, sun & wind. Probably as it has the nearest meter.
-
I use ecmwf
-
@Korina
ECMWF is by far the most accurate in my area -
@Korina MBLUE seems to work best for Minnesota
-
I
m a ocean sailor from Argentine, sailing high latitude (more than 50 degree). I always compare the four models !!! Its more accurate and make more safety our navigation...
Recomendation, always compare all models to plan a route
Josè -
@Korina Tracy from Texas here & we're melting. A combination of Basic and GFS helps me pray for rain & a change in the jet stream.
-
@Korina NAM and HRRR seem to be more accurate where I live.
-
@Korina In Belgium I use ECMWF and ICON. Both are very good.
-
@Korina i use Ecmwf raraly metoblue when in mountians or near the lakes
-
@Korina I prefer the Mixed models view. The more information, the better, as far as I’m concerned. For different seasons, and different conditions, I prefer various models.
-
@Korina In Belgium I use ECMWF and ICON. Both are very good.
-
@Korina I use the ECMWF model the most for sailing in the Med and western Atlantic
-
Windy Community | Powered by excellent
NodeBB