<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Feature Request: Compare past model predictions with actual results]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I think it would be really helpful to have tools we can use to not only compare model forecasts with each other, as we already can, but to also compare the <em>past</em> predictions with what the true weather turned out to be. In my case, even though ECMWF seems to be the more "highly respected" model, I have subjectively noticed that GFS seems to have generally more accurate in the particular area I usually sail in. I can't confirm this intuitive observation with data, though, and that's what I'd like to be able to do.</p>
<p dir="auto">What I'd <em>like</em> to be able to do is pick a location and a time/date and see what the actual recorded weather conditions were vs. the forecasts 1, 3, 5, and 7 days prior. Some limitations to save storage would be perfectly understandable. E.g. perhaps a max of 90 days of past data, with decreasing resolution further back in that window, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RRDtool" rel="nofollow ugc">Round Robin Database</a>-style.</p>
<p dir="auto">This data might be useful to <a href="http://Windy.com" rel="nofollow ugc">Windy.com</a>, as well. Patterns might emerge over time where you could provide heatmaps of which models tend to be accurate more often in specific regions. That additional guidance would be a great value-add for users.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/26353/feature-request-compare-past-model-predictions-with-actual-results</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 02:26:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/26353.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 20:14:13 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Feature Request: Compare past model predictions with actual results on Sat, 24 Jun 2023 02:15:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/idefix37" aria-label="Profile: idefix37">@<bdi>idefix37</bdi></a> Whoa, very cool...thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/148450</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/148450</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mikenerone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2023 02:15:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Feature Request: Compare past model predictions with actual results on Fri, 23 Jun 2023 21:35:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mikenerone" aria-label="Profile: mikenerone">@<bdi>mikenerone</bdi></a><br />
The feature <em>Forecast vs observation.</em> is already available in Windy.<br />
Select <em>Reported wind</em> or <em>Reported temperature</em> to choose a weather station in your area. It is better to choose a professional weather station, wmo or ad (airport) labelled.<br />
Then you can compare the model predictions during the last days and the weather station observations:</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1687555970523-f47b54e6-f972-462a-bace-068fbf930684.jpeg" alt="F47B54E6-F972-462A-BACE-068FBF930684.jpeg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/148437</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/148437</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 21:35:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>