<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[ECMWF vs ICON-EU Wind&#x2F;Wind Gusts]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi guys,</p>
<p dir="auto">I am located in Bulgaria, Eastern Europe and I mostly rely on ECMWF(mainly for cloud coverage and wind) for the mountain weather forecast. I hike a lot in the winter mountain and often spend the night there at altitude 2500/2900m. I've always felt confident with the ECMWF model because for the past 3 years I've compared the forecast with the actual conditions and never had any major surprises. Recently I was unpleasantly surprised by high winds a few times so I also started checking the Icon-EU. My problem is that very often both models shows a big wind amplitude and I am wondering why is it so. I understand that the Icon Eu is more precise but that still doesn't explain the big difference, at least in my opinion. I may be mistaken so any advice will be appreciated.</p>
<p dir="auto">This is the forecast for Sunday/Monday this week for the exact same location. You can notice the difference in the Wind/Wind Gusts</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>ICON EU:</strong></p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1700249696575-windy-golqm-polejan-dobrinishte-weather-forecast.png" alt="Windy-Golqm-Polejan-Dobrinishte-weather-forecast.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ECMWF:</strong><br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1700249766683-windy-golqm-polejan-dobrinishte-weather-forecast-1.png" alt="Windy-Golqm-Polejan-Dobrinishte-weather-forecast (1).png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/29835/ecmwf-vs-icon-eu-wind-wind-gusts</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 23:15:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/29835.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 19:38:20 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ECMWF vs ICON-EU Wind&#x2F;Wind Gusts on Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:57:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tervelkutsev" aria-label="Profile: tervelkutsev">@<bdi>tervelkutsev</bdi></a> said</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">temp and wind and often I see mismatches with all models.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Remember that  medium resolution models cannot be very accurate in mountain for these 2 parameters.</p>
<p dir="auto">See the grid of a 2km resolution model over a mountainous area:<br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1700326073437-cb1ccedd-f863-4e3d-949c-a5d205e7192a.jpeg" alt="CB1CCEDD-F863-4E3D-949C-A5D205E7192A.jpeg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">So with 9 or 7km resolution it is worse.<br />
Meteoblue is supposed to correct the altitude inaccuracy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/168887</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/168887</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:57:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ECMWF vs ICON-EU Wind&#x2F;Wind Gusts on Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:00:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/idefix37" aria-label="Profile: idefix37">@<bdi>idefix37</bdi></a> I usually compare the forecast with the live data from the cameras in the mountain weather stations - temp and wind and often I see mismatches with all models. Sometimes ECMWF is very accurate, sometimes Icon and sometimes Meteoblue. For example all models today were predicting 85km/h wind gusts top and in reality they reached 110km/h. I know that I want the impossible, after all it is just a prediction. I will consider the data of all models and will have in mind a 20% on top of the predicted wind gusts just in case. Thanks for your help!</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/168880</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/168880</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tervelkutsev]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 16:00:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ECMWF vs ICON-EU Wind&#x2F;Wind Gusts on Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:38:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tervelkutsev" aria-label="Profile: tervelkutsev">@<bdi>tervelkutsev</bdi></a><br />
I understand that Wind is your main concern. Meteoblue is better for wind prediction at this weather station location than ECMWF and ICON-EU. But I did not check at every weather station in mountain.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/168826</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/168826</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:38:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ECMWF vs ICON-EU Wind&#x2F;Wind Gusts on Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:26:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/idefix37" aria-label="Profile: idefix37">@<bdi>idefix37</bdi></a> Appreciate the reply!</p>
<p dir="auto">I find Meteoblue to be inaccurate for wind and cloud coverage but I check it for temperature. I will try the observation vs forecast feature for sure.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/168819</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/168819</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tervelkutsev]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 07:26:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to ECMWF vs ICON-EU Wind&#x2F;Wind Gusts on Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:30:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tervelkutsev" aria-label="Profile: tervelkutsev">@<bdi>tervelkutsev</bdi></a><br />
In mountain, the high resolution models are generally more accurate. Unfortunately in Windy there is no such a model over Bulgaria. ECMWF model is 9km, and ICON-EU just a bit better with 7km. Then it depends of their orography integrated models.<br />
Have you tried Meteoblue ? This Swiss model is quite good in mountain, but only available in the local forecast table.<br />
The <em>Observation vs forecast</em> feature (select Reported wind or Reported temperature) makes a comparison between a weather station and the model forecast.<br />
Here is an example with Meteoblue.<br />
You can do the same with ECMWF and ICON-EU.</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1700255008686-5c9bf276-13e3-44a4-a9ea-c52bde857590.jpeg" alt="5C9BF276-13E3-44A4-A9EA-C52BDE857590.jpeg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">This screenshot shows the Temperature layer, which is a good way to show how a weather model fine-tunes the terrain.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/168803</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/168803</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 21:30:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>