Windy Community
    • Unread
    • Categories
    • Groups
    • Go to windy.com
    • Register
    • Login

    Undervalued Canadian Radar Reflectivities

    Bug Reports
    3
    6
    952
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • WeatherInThePegW
      WeatherInThePeg | Premium
      last edited by

      Re: RADAR Drop-Out At High dBz

      Just following up on this as I'm not sure if the RADAR processing techniques have changed since this adjustment or not.

      Over the past couple months, I've noticed RADAR returns on the Canadian Prairies looking quite weak...far weaker than they should be. When comparing to other RADAR applications, such as Radarscope, the returns in Windy can often be 10-15 dBz lower than the raw data is suggesting.

      Which makes me wonder...if you're ingesting the pre-made imagery, if it's CAPPI imagery then it really needs to be altered between winter and summer (1.0 vs 1.5 km CAPPI). I believe on their GeoMet API, the RADAR imagery has been standardized to 1km, but I'm not familiar with the ins and outs of that.

      Anyways, all that to say that I've noticed that the RADAR returns are very cool on the Canadian Prairies since we moved into winter (to the point that sometimes I can barely see precipitation moving through the area) and my gut feeling is that it's due to a 1.5 km CAPPI which isn't particularly applicable in winter time.

      I do wish Canada just put out a PPI image and called it a day.

      WeatherInThePegW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • WeatherInThePegW
        WeatherInThePeg @WeatherInThePeg | Premium
        last edited by

        @WeatherInThePeg Just following up to say that I realized the GeoMet products are on a 1km grid, not a 1km altitude.

        Filip_KF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Filip_KF
          Filip_K Developers @WeatherInThePeg
          last edited by Filip_K

          Hi @WeatherInThePeg, we were using per-site RAIN part of PRECIP-ET product (docs here, data here) from MSC Datamart.

          Unfortunately they are separate for rain and snow. Rain product seems to be okay for warm half the year, snow for the cold one. I have switched our ingress processing to start using the SNOW product for now, which should help temporarily. This is the difference
          na-ca_rain-vs-snow.gif

          In the long run, we'll have to find a way to do this automatically, probably combining both products together

          idefix37I WeatherInThePegW 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • idefix37I
            idefix37 Sailor Moderator @Filip_K
            last edited by idefix37

            @Filip_K
            Would it be possible, in this particular case where snow precipitation can be separated from rain precipitation, to mix them with a different colour scale. As it is done by Meteociel here:
            https://www.meteociel.fr/observations-meteo/radar2.php?mode=1
            Note this is just a guess of the portion of precipitation that could fall as snow by filtering it with temperature forecast by AROME.

            9E855FAA-D228-4B22-8F63-8145517482CF.jpeg

            Snow colour scale could be brown -> red -> white.
            Just a thought …

            Filip_KF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Filip_KF
              Filip_K Developers @idefix37
              last edited by

              Hi @idefix37, yes, my thoughts exactly. We definitely want to use rain/snow information wherever possible, we're just not there yet. Some providers already give this information (in form of hydrometeor clasification, separate rain/snow products, ...) and some don't.

              We're in very early stages but this is something we want to upgrade down the road

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • WeatherInThePegW
                WeatherInThePeg @Filip_K | Premium
                last edited by

                @Filip_K Thanks so much for the quick fix to another Canadian RADAR issue.

                It is unfortunate; I do wish that either raw data was freely available or they just also produced a PPI image so there wasn't seasonality to the applicable imagery.

                They are producing a precipitation type product on their GeoMet API under the Radar_1km_SfcPrecipType product, but I don't think that would be particularly helpful in an automated system.

                Thanks again for looking into it and the quick adjustment!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • idefix37I idefix37 referenced this topic on
                • First post
                  Last post
                Windyty, S.E. - all rights reserved. Powered by excellent NodeBB
                NodeBB & contributors, OSM & contributors, HERE maps
                Terms of Use     Privacy Policy