<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[A better way to organize waves]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Instead of the arbitrary “wind swell” “waves” “swell 1” perhaps it would be best to organize and filter the waves using the following three criteria, period, size, direction.<br />
Earth.nullschool’s peak wave period is super helpful and really shows the nature of the single swell in a sea of multiple swells. Hoping to seeif windy can do one better of this. But as it stands earth shows swell much better than windy except windy does do the Great Lakes.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/30802/a-better-way-to-organize-waves</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 21:57:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/30802.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:37:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A better way to organize waves on Thu, 11 Jan 2024 06:04:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/taylor-stubbins" aria-label="Profile: Taylor-Stubbins">@<bdi>Taylor-Stubbins</bdi></a> Thank you for these suggestions. We will consider this in upcoming plans.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/174960</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/174960</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 06:04:50 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>