<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Add NOAA RRFS]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello, I was wondering if there was any thought or development to add the new NOAA Rapid Refresh Forecast System (RRFS) model to Windy?</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://registry.opendata.aws/noaa-rrfs/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://registry.opendata.aws/noaa-rrfs/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/32538/add-noaa-rrfs</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 18:16:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/32538.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 01:40:21 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NOAA RRFS on Fri, 19 Jun 2026 17:06:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/suty" aria-label="Profile: Suty">@<bdi>Suty</bdi></a> I appreciate the update and look forward to hearing more later this year!</p>
<p dir="auto">Cheers</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/229042</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/229042</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[illili]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 17:06:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NOAA RRFS on Thu, 18 Jun 2026 05:02:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/illili" aria-label="Profile: illili">@<bdi>illili</bdi></a> Hello, right now, I don't have any specific news about this project on our end, however, it is possible it will be started when our colleague comes back from the vacation at the end of the summer. At least I will have more info about this for you.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/228993</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/228993</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 05:02:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NOAA RRFS on Wed, 17 Jun 2026 16:10:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/suty" aria-label="Profile: suty">@<bdi>suty</bdi></a> Does Windy have any update on RRFS being added? The data is already available and will move from Experimental to production later this year.</p>
<p dir="auto">We'll be losing the NAM here in North America/Alaska/Hawaii, so this will be an important tool to have, especially given it pushes out 84 hours vs the NAMs 60 and also updates every hour for 18 hours out like the HRRR currently does.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/228985</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/228985</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[illili]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 16:10:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NOAA RRFS on Wed, 17 Jun 2026 13:44:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/filip_k" aria-label="Profile: Filip_K">@<bdi>Filip_K</bdi></a> is the RRFS still in the works? The NWS statement of retiring the NAM combined with the RRFS moving out of experimental is a big push.</p>
<p dir="auto">Plus, the RRFS pushes out further than the HRRR, while also being high resolution. I’ve been using it via their DESI tool that’s public facing and found it to be very helpful.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/228981</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/228981</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[illili]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 13:44:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NOAA RRFS on Thu, 14 May 2026 02:22:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have heard that the NWS has recently issued a statement that they will be retiring the NAM set of models on August 31st of this year. This means that the NAM 3km currently on Windy will no longer operate past this date. The NWS will replace this model with RRFS, which is moving out of experimental phase from that date onward. There could be a good chance that Windy considers adding this model in the coming months, though it's up to the Windy team to decide on this change. I think it is was worth noting ahead of time on this. The HRRR model will continue to be operational for at least a few years if not longer.</p>
<p dir="auto">Link to Statement:<br />
<a href="https://www.weather.gov/media/notification/pdf_2026/scn26-48_RRFS_and_REFS_Implementation.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.weather.gov/media/notification/pdf_2026/scn26-48_RRFS_and_REFS_Implementation.pdf</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/227794</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/227794</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Weather2004]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 02:22:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NOAA RRFS on Tue, 16 Apr 2024 07:33:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/adetzel17" aria-label="Profile: adetzel17">@<bdi>adetzel17</bdi></a>, thank you for letting us know. RRFS is definitely on our radar and last time we checked, it was still in experimental phase. We'll examine it more and if it fits our needs and needs of our users, we will add it</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/187212</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/187212</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Filip_K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 07:33:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>