Inconsistent behavior in skew-t for NAM and HRRR models

[ShawnKM]

Please forgive me if I am misinterpreting things as I only recently learned how to read a skew-t but I noticed something strange.

The skew-t plot for my area (Denver, Colorado, elevation is about 1600m ) starts at 1000 millibars or sea level when using the NAM or HRRR models. However when I switch to the ECMWF model, it starts at 800 millibars which is closer to what I would expect.

Here is the NAM skew-t in windy:

For reference, this is the NAM skew-t from the NOAA web page:

[Filip_K]

Hi @ShawnKM, this is bug, we'll look into it. Thank you for reporting the issue

[ShawnKM]

Hey, I just wanted to say I noticed that NAM and HRRR seem to be starting at the correct ground pressure now. Thanks for fixing this!