<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[A better meteogram for light aviation?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The meteogram (cross section of cloud heights along a timeline) is a really nice way to think about VFR flying, but the windy one isn’t useful for me at least.</p>
<p dir="auto">Light aircraft spend most of their time below 5000ft and that is just too squished on the graph to be any use.</p>
<p dir="auto">Could you expand the graph vertically and use a non linear y scale?  Or linear in pressure not metres?  Small height differences really matter close to the ground but much less at FL100+.</p>
<p dir="auto">Meteoblue have a nice one.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/34316/a-better-meteogram-for-light-aviation</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 12:50:37 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/34316.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 07:21:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>