<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[PM 2.5 data inaccurate]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="http://AirNow.gov" rel="nofollow ugc">AirNow.gov</a> has accurate current data displayed indicating unhealthy PM2.5 for my area (PM2.5<a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/127" aria-label="Profile: 127">@<bdi>127</bdi></a>). According to Windy, PM2.5 is clear and healthy @ under 10 on the scale for my location when I can currently see and taste bad air. Locations down wind of active fires also show very low PM2.5!   Disappointing in Windy's data! Premium ask for $$ for accurate data??</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/35838/pm-2-5-data-inaccurate</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 03:26:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/35838.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2024 17:59:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PM 2.5 data inaccurate on Sun, 28 Jul 2024 12:42:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/browndog1" aria-label="Profile: Browndog1">@<bdi>Browndog1</bdi></a><br />
In addition to what <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/%C3%B8rjan-p-stien" aria-label="Profile: Ørjan-P-Stien">@<bdi>Ørjan-P-Stien</bdi></a> says, here is what the PM2.5 layer means in Windy.</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1722152370532-d7254ad3-cd24-4d49-8393-cccc183cdf3b.jpeg" alt="D7254AD3-CD24-4D49-8393-CCCC183CDF3B.jpeg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">These large-scale forecasts do not provide any local precision.<br />
As <a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/caefix" aria-label="Profile: Caefix">@<bdi>Caefix</bdi></a> said, it is better to rely on the readings of Air quality stations in the POIs.</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1722152730019-5c02fb28-932e-4c47-b159-135aa966a0a9-resized.jpeg" alt="5C02FB28-932E-4C47-B159-135AA966A0A9.jpeg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/196678</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/196678</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 12:42:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PM 2.5 data inaccurate on Sun, 28 Jul 2024 07:04:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/browndog1" aria-label="Profile: Browndog1">@<bdi>Browndog1</bdi></a> , hi , no personal offence, remember the pm2,5 data maps is a ''forecast'', what itll probably be according to wx models...seems like people, me and you included has forgotten that ...</p>
<p dir="auto">so if air taste like unhealthy, it usually is that ... take immidiate action</p>
<p dir="auto">have a glorious day</p>
<p dir="auto">ørjan</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/196674</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/196674</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ørjan P Stien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 07:04:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PM 2.5 data inaccurate on Sat, 27 Jul 2024 20:40:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/browndog1" aria-label="Profile: Browndog1">@<bdi>Browndog1</bdi></a> 🏭 Have You tried the air-quality switch?<br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1722112835102-air-quality.png" alt="Air-quality.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/196661</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/196661</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Caefix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2024 20:40:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>