<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[GFS o ECMWF ???]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Ciao a tutti<br />
Quale modello migliore per<br />
Raffiche vento a suolo, GFS o ECMWF<br />
Saluti</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/3584/gfs-o-ecmwf</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:46:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/3584.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:59:56 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to GFS o ECMWF ??? on Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:25:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">and here is an article answering your question!<br />
<a href="http://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/PT.3.3046" rel="nofollow ugc">http://physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/PT.3.3046</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/4974</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/4974</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gkikas LGPZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:25:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to GFS o ECMWF ??? on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:49:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/poldo" aria-label="Profile: poldo">@<bdi>poldo</bdi></a><br />
Here you can find the statistics comparison for the models<br />
<a href="http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/STATS/STATS.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/STATS/STATS.html</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/4812</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/4812</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gkikas LGPZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:49:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>