Windy Community

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Unread
    • Categories
    • Groups
    • Go to windy.com

    Clouds Bases

    Your Feedback and Suggestions
    aglmsl clouds
    11
    24
    7289
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Gkikas LGPZ
      Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @TZ last edited by

      @TZ
      Thanks a lot! You're awesome!!!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • waynemcc
        waynemcc @TZ | Premium last edited by

        @TZ To be consistent with ATC vocabulary, the current display of Cloud Bases (because they are in AGL) should be renamed Ceilings. I would also suggest adding a separate display called Cloud Bases which would be in MSL.
        I have few complaints about the fine Windy product... but the above misuse of AGL for MSL, also occurs with Freezing Level, which currently is AGL and be much more useful if displayed in MSL. When we pick an altitude to fly, we want to know forecasted Freezing Level in MSL.
        Thanks for a fine product.
        Wayne, pilot

        Gabou971 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Gabou971
          Gabou971 Moderator @waynemcc last edited by Gabou971

          Yep, good point, but I think It would be simplier to use the same feature if you're a pilot or not.

          First, it might be a good idea to explain what are height and altitude to other users => height has the ground level for reference (AGL-above ground level). Altitude has the main sea level for reference (MSL)

          There are in my opinion two options regarding aeronautical weather data :

          -Forecaster point of view: Using charts, he gives the ALTITUDE of clouds (from MSL - main sea level) and doesn't care how you use the info...

          -Pilots or controllers point of view: They don't want you to crash and provide the HEIGHT (from AGL - above ground level) of cloud base. So you have an idea of what you're going to see (or not...) while arriving or departing from an airport, whatever the altitude of the airfield.

          Considering this, I think that giving the HEIGHT of cloud base is the best option (AGL), which is already the case. It is also good for non pilot users as it provides a useful and easily understandable info.

          Regarding Freezing level... It's indeed more useful for pilots when using ALTITUDE (MSL) for other technical reasons. And... It's more logical for pilots but also for other users ... For hikers for exemple. They want to know the freezing ALTITUDE and not height, so they can compare it with the ALTITUDE of a mountain for exemple, because what is depicted on topo charts are ALTITUDEs.

          A good solution in my opinion would be to use the words "height" and "altitude"in windy layers names and provide a clear definition of these 2 terms in the help forum section/legend, and obviously use MSL for freezing level and AGL for cloud base.

          Gkikas LGPZ idefix37 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 4
          • Gkikas LGPZ
            Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @Gabou971 last edited by Gkikas LGPZ

            @Gabou971
            Freezing level, (named Zero Degree Level (DEG0L) by ECMWF with ID=228024),
            is the height of level (counted from 'surface')
            where the temperature passes from positive to negative values.
            https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/set-i#I-i-a_fc

            Model's "surface" (named Orography(Z) by ECMWF with ID=129)
            over rough terrain may vary a lot compared with actual altitude from MSL.
            https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/set-i#I-i-a

            It might be a good idea to have a Freezing Level chart using altitude from MSL,
            where FRZ LVL = DEG0L+Z

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • idefix37
              idefix37 Sailor Moderator @Gabou971 last edited by idefix37

              @Gabou971
              Excellent presentation and analysis of these issues of height and altitude. It would be a good idea to clarify them.
              I am not a pilot, but nevertheless interested to have the Freezing altitude expressed not by the height AGL, but by the altitude above MSL. This would be a useful mean to get a better idea of ​​the rain-snow limit in mountain, which global models are unable to provide given their horizontal and vertical low resolution.

              Gkikas LGPZ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Gkikas LGPZ
                Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @idefix37 last edited by

                ... also, I want to point out that,
                acording to "Database Ref. Manual for ICON"
                ( https://www.dwd.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/modelldokumentationen/nwv/icon/icon_dbbeschr_aktuell.html ), page 33

                for ICON model, the Height of 0 degree Celsius isotherm (short name HZEROLOC)
                has MSL as a reference.

                Thus, the frz. alt. from ECMWF and frz. alt. from ICON, are different!

                61335858-e106-430f-9697-500c18cc8b96-εικόνα.png
                Nuremberg's altitude is 314m

                Gabou971 ivo idefix37 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • Gabou971
                  Gabou971 Moderator @Gkikas LGPZ last edited by

                  ahh nice about ICON I didn't check it because my area is only covered by GFS and ECMWF.

                  Yeah I think those changes wouldn't be hard to make... But that's a non-developer point of view :)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • ivo
                    ivo Administrator @Gkikas LGPZ last edited by

                    @Gkikas-LGPZ this is important info thank you

                    Gkikas LGPZ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • idefix37
                      idefix37 Sailor Moderator @Gkikas LGPZ last edited by idefix37

                      @Gkikas-LGPZ
                      OK your example in Nuremberg seems to demonstrate that ICON 0°C isotherm is MSL, which is confirmed by the Ref. Manual.

                      But how do you explain that this morning in Greece ICON shows on Windy a Freezing « altitude » at 0m in mountains of 1800m alt. approx. and, at close distance, in low land of 100m alt. approx., a Freezing « altitude » at 1300m.

                      E8F2FBF6-81FC-4090-947A-A9CEB595A9CC.jpeg

                      Switching to ECMWF we see the same figures at same places, but just with a lower resolution map.
                      For me both ICON and ECMWF on Windy seem to display a Freezing HEIGHT AGL.

                      Gkikas LGPZ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Gkikas LGPZ
                        Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @idefix37 last edited by

                        @idefix37
                        It seems that you are right!
                        So, I can give you those two explanations:

                        1. DWD ICON ref. manual is wrong
                          919531ff-c6fd-4e4a-a90f-cb4eb873cc08-εικόνα.png

                        2. Windy uses a different parameter!

                        I hope Windy team will investigate that.

                        Gkikas LGPZ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • Gkikas LGPZ
                          Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @ivo last edited by Gkikas LGPZ

                          @ivo
                          Please check if Windy uses HZEROLOC parameter for frz. alt.(ICON).
                          Read the comments above.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Gkikas LGPZ
                            Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @Gkikas LGPZ last edited by Gkikas LGPZ

                            @Tomber42
                            You speak German fluently. Isn't it?
                            I'd be grateful if you ask DWD if there is a mistake in their reference manual
                            https://www.dwd.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/modelldokumentationen/nwv/icon/icon_dbbeschr_aktuell.html
                            (description of HZEROCL, Table 7.5, page 46 on Ref. Manual version 1.2.6).
                            Above msl or above surface?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Tomber42
                              Tomber42 Moderator last edited by

                              I'm at vacation tomorrow, so I write a text for you here and you can send it to dwd

                              Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
                              Ich hätte eine Frage zur Dokumentation des Icon Modell. In der Doku "insert link to dokument " sprechen Sie bei der Beschreibung von HZEROCL, Tabelle 7.5, Seite 46,Version 1.2.6 von MSL oder über Grund Höhe?

                              Mit freundlichen Grüßen
                              "your name"

                              Greetings from Tomber

                              Gkikas LGPZ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • Gkikas LGPZ
                                Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @Tomber42 last edited by Gkikas LGPZ

                                @Tomber42
                                @idefix37
                                @ivo

                                DWD answered:
                                " the freezing level (HZEROCL) is provided in m ASL,
                                but it is set to zero (rather than the height of the model topography)
                                if the freezing level is at the surface.

                                However, I see that this should be changed in our diagnostic
                                calculation, as well as the scanning direction (which should be top-down
                                rather than bottom-up) in order to detect the uppermost freezing level."

                                So, dear idefix37, I think it answers your/our question!

                                btw how does AROME handle the subject?

                                idefix37 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • idefix37
                                  idefix37 Sailor Moderator @Gkikas LGPZ last edited by idefix37

                                  @Gkikas-LGPZ said in Clouds Bases:

                                  @Tomber42
                                  @idefix37
                                  @ivo

                                  I think it answers your/our question!

                                  btw how does AROME handle the subject?

                                  Yes, I think... but to clarify the "Freezing altitude" layer on Windy, should we understand that this level is counted as Altitude above sea level, but when this level intersects terrain located at a higher altitude , then this level is measured in relation to the ground itself, as Height above the ground.
                                  So this layer should be called FREEZING LEVEL, as sometime it is measured as ALTITUDE above sea level (asl), sometime as HEIGHT above ground.

                                  In Windy, if you check the Freezing level with AROME it switches to ECMWF. So this layer is not available with this model

                                  In the example below (left map) the Freezing level is at 2400m in West of the Alps and at 0m just above the high summits, as described here above for ICON.
                                  On same locations, the Freezing altitude from AROME data on Meteociel (Right map) is shown at 2700-2600m even when this altitude intersects mountains at 3000 or 4000m.

                                  8391598B-3576-493D-B977-4FB8A3919388.jpeg

                                  So there are different ways to display the Freezing level as we could try to summarise with this sketch:

                                  EDCC022F-6819-4D8F-BAFC-52F7277E3963.jpeg

                                  I am more familiar with Freezing altitude asl, which is much more precise for outdoors activity in mountains. The Height above ground is too coarse due to the low altitude resolution of the orographic model integrated in the model itself.

                                  Anyway, at least, it clarifies the way how this layer must be interpreted...

                                  Thanks for your investigation

                                  Alain

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • dirk001
                                    dirk001 @TZ last edited by

                                    @TZ Hi there, I just checked this old post and it seems like Windy cloud base can still be < 50% cloud cover so you never changed over to ECMWF Ceiling? or am I missing something here in New Zealand? Lots of days when cloud base green around 2000m but cloud cover only say 20%.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • J
                                      jpsurin @TZ last edited by

                                      @TZ yes ceiling is really useful for pilots . it would be great to have this parameter available.

                                      TZ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • TZ
                                        TZ Administrator @jpsurin last edited by

                                        @jpsurin It is already available as "Cloud base" layer.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        Windyty, S.E. - all rights reserved. Powered by excellent NodeBB
                                        NodeBB & contributors, OSM & contributors, HERE maps
                                        Terms and Conditions     Privacy Policy