<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Rain Accumulation layer point toals sensitive to zoom...]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I notice that the forecast rain accumulation totals for a specific location differs dependending on the level of zoom applied to the map, all oothe factors constant.  Is this some residual averaging artifact from something like map resolution crossing model resolution?<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1734587861922-5c841ba9-fe44-4300-bf06-2576a899f978-image-resized.png" alt="5c841ba9-fe44-4300-bf06-2576a899f978-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" />  ...vs  <img src="/assets/uploads/files/1734587904303-faddcc4d-5da4-4921-805f-2222c7ef401a-image-resized.png" alt="faddcc4d-5da4-4921-805f-2222c7ef401a-image.png" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /> ..(zoom out 1 click)</p>
<p dir="auto">This was in GFS (22km) model<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/38010/rain-accumulation-layer-point-toals-sensitive-to-zoom</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:15:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/38010.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:59:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Rain Accumulation layer point toals sensitive to zoom... on Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:43:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/contact123" aria-label="Profile: contact123">@<bdi>contact123</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/204786">Rain Accumulation layer point toals sensitive to zoom...</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I notice that the forecast rain accumulation totals for a specific location differs dependending on the level of zoom applied to the map, all oothe factors constant. Is this some residual averaging artifact from something like map resolution crossing model resolution?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Yes, This behavior is common in many weather visualization tools. For the most accurate forecast for a given location, it is best to rely on the most zoomed view available or examine specific point data directly from the model source.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/204803</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/204803</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bankladies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:43:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>