<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Interpolation at Different Altitude]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Windy displays weather values at fixed altitudes, can the wind/temperatures/gusts values be interpolated for in-between altitudes? For eg, we can know the wind values at particular location at FL300 and FL340, can we use interpolation to calculate wind values at FL310,320 and 330?</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/4019/interpolation-at-different-altitude</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 09:45:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/4019.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 05:09:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interpolation at Different Altitude on Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:10:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/giganticvis" aria-label="Profile: giganticvis">@<bdi>giganticvis</bdi></a><br />
I believe linear is OK, exept the levels around tropopause and jetstreams were there is a discontinuity in temp. and wind.   For the height of tropopause and the location and height of jet streams you must consult a Significant Weather Chart    <a href="http://www.flightwork.com/weather/significant-weather-charts.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.flightwork.com/weather/significant-weather-charts.html</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/5775</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/5775</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gkikas LGPZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:10:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interpolation at Different Altitude on Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:00:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">@meteo-GR Which interpolation would give more accurate results? I mean linear, polynomial, spline interpolation or is any other type of interpolation is used specifically for weather?</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/5774</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/5774</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[giganticvis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:00:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interpolation at Different Altitude on Thu, 08 Jun 2017 08:37:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/giganticvis" aria-label="Profile: giganticvis">@<bdi>giganticvis</bdi></a><br />
I think "yes". Thats, also, the way models work!<br />
The "output" of this "manual" interpolation is very accurate for high altitudes (&gt;FL100).<br />
At lower altitudes the situation is more complex due to landscape (geophysical turbulence).<br />
Actually the model outputs data at many levels (e.g. 137 levels for ECMWF) but the parameters (temp., wind etc) are given at certain pressure levels (e.g. 850hPa=FL050, 700hPa=FL100 etc).</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/5772</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/5772</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gkikas LGPZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 08:37:02 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>