<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Sea ice]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Would love to see a layer that shows current Sea ice coverage. For me I would use this on the Bering Sea.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/40667/sea-ice</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:02:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/40667.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 21:00:09 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Sea ice on Tue, 01 Jul 2025 18:00:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/nick-malahovsky" aria-label="Profile: Nick-Malahovsky">@<bdi>Nick-Malahovsky</bdi></a><br />
The ECMWF Wave layer provides a forecast, may be coarse, of sea ice coverage. These are the gray areas above the sea.<br />
Currently in the vicinity of the Bering Sea</p>
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/1751370863401-b61e1095-9732-4a2a-91c9-f63dbdea944c.jpeg" alt="B61E1095-9732-4A2A-91C9-F63DBDEA944C.jpeg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
<p dir="auto">More information:<br />
<a href="https://community.windy.com/topic/30319/ice-coverage/2?_=1751352201750">https://community.windy.com/topic/30319/ice-coverage/2?_=1751352201750</a></p>
<p dir="auto">But there is may be more accurate data about sea ice for safe sailing in these regions.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/214335</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/214335</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 18:00:53 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>