Windy Community
    • Unread
    • Categories
    • Groups
    • Go to windy.com
    • Register
    • Login

    Aviation Winds Aloft on Airgram

    General Discussion
    4
    13
    6.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      andrew2213
      last edited by andrew2213

      love the app and the website. im a pilot and love the wind/radar/metar/taf's etc.
      in the airgram detailed forecast the winds aloft are given in Hpa. in aviation we use MSL for winds aloft. pilots would need to do a complicated conversion every 100 NM to be accurate especially when crossing frontal boundaries or areas of large pressure changes. 800hpa isnt always 6400ft MSL and 900hpa isnt always 3000ft msl. some places that you click on...lets say a mountainous area...3000ft (900hpa) is under the ground but the chart is still showing a wind barb for that altitude.

      The same thing goes for the wind overlay where you can select a pressure setting (altitude) and it shows the wind streams with color coded velocity

      this could be a smaller issue than im thinking it is because a lot of pilots are saying how awesome this site is.
      any light that could be shed on this would be greatly apriciated...because i could just be way over thinking this

      thanks

      Gkikas LGPZG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • A
        andrew2213
        last edited by andrew2213

        Ok so looks like all MSL altitudes for winds aloft are based on Standard atmosphere so abovee FL180 it won’t make a difference because we set our altimeters to standard and below FL180 it will be just a few hundred ft off or so....so no big deal I guess...??

        Still don’t understand why there is wind info given for the surface and then 2000/3000 ft MSL etc in areas where the elevation of the ground is like 5000 or 10000MSL etc in like Colorado or mountainous areas

        TChilliT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • TChilliT
          TChilli @andrew2213 | Premium
          last edited by

          @andrew2213 said in Aviation Winds Aloft on Airgram:

          ...Still don’t understand why there is wind info given for the surface and then 2000/3000 ft MSL etc in areas where the elevation of the ground is like 5000 or 10000MSL etc in like Colorado or mountainous areas.

          I would love to hear a good explanation for this question. I live in Colorado, and there are wind barbs on the airgram at hPa corresponding to an approximate elevation of several hundred feet beneath the dirt I'm standing on. Also, I wonder about that sam issue as related to the map display, when you can set altitude based on pressure. Just skip the 850-1000 hPa range?

          P.S. I think when I finally have all this sorted out well enough, I'm going to post a very thorough "explainer" with a bunch of screenshots so nobody gets as confused as me again (⊙.☉)7

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • Gkikas LGPZG
            Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @andrew2213
            last edited by Gkikas LGPZ

            @andrew2213
            @TChilli
            It may help
            https://community.windy.com/topic/5014/windspeed-and-direction-different-heights

            Gkikas LGPZG vujacicmV 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • Gkikas LGPZG
              Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @Gkikas LGPZ
              last edited by Gkikas LGPZ

              @TChilli
              .... Aspen, CO has a 10.000 ft elevation (roughly 700 hPa)
              In the airgram the "fictionary" winds at lower levels are those given by the model
              as the pressure levels are terrain following
              95f24c0d-e120-4f5d-8f05-fb37e94a521a-εικόνα.png

              Gkikas LGPZG TChilliT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • Gkikas LGPZG
                Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @Gkikas LGPZ
                last edited by Gkikas LGPZ

                @TChilli
                .... If you activate the "sounding" for Aspen ...
                282a5242-63c4-4fa9-8c10-10a1557cbca1-εικόνα.png

                ... you'll have a more realistic view (winds and temp/d.p. start from the ground, not from msl)

                18e24fec-f837-41b3-bd5f-eaf0be87777e-εικόνα.png

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • TChilliT
                  TChilli @Gkikas LGPZ | Premium
                  last edited by TChilli

                  @Gkikas-LGPZ said in Aviation Winds Aloft on Airgram:

                  @TChilli
                  .... Aspen, CO has a 10.000 ft elevation (roughly 700 hPa)
                  In the airgram the "fictionary" winds at lower levels are those given by the model
                  as the pressure levels are terrain following...

                  Thanks for that! I actually looked at those images in the other thread before, but something you said made it click this time ...I think.
                  So, if I’m understanding you correctly, the isobaric surfaces are technically actually contiguous, but they are highly compressed at higher altitudes (functionally, to the point of being at the same plane, relatively speaking). As such, any barbs below your altitude on the airgram are still modeled, but can be ignored if they’re below x hPa (700 hPa in your example). [edit to insert for clarification: ok, not actually “ignored” completely, because they are functionally the surface winds at 700 hPa, but below that they are all pretty much the same direction & strength, so ignoring the bottom bit is fine].
                  However, if I’m also understanding atmospheric pressure systems and the way they move, to be technically most accurate you can’t truly just say “Ignore everything below 700 hPa” and be done. This is because as pressure systems move, they also lower/raise the regional atmospheric pressure a bit, such that a really accurate statement would be more like, “Today, in a low pressure system, everything below 690 hPa can be ignored on the airgram.” Though, that sort of precision is largely superfluous and there is better information to be gleaned from understanding pressure systems and their movement. Additionally, if you want accurate surface wind speeds, the easiest thing to do is look at sounding. Let me know if I really missed the mark on that stuff. Otherwise, I think I finally got it :D.
                  Thanks!

                  Gkikas LGPZG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • Gkikas LGPZG
                    Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @TChilli
                    last edited by

                    @TChilli
                    Yes, you got it!
                    Always keep in mind that complex terrain is a major source of inaccuracy in models.

                    TChilliT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • TChilliT
                      TChilli @Gkikas LGPZ | Premium
                      last edited by

                      @Gkikas-LGPZ
                      Good deal. Glad to hear it. Thanks for the explanation. One more question, and I think I’ve got Windy sorted out...
                      It appears as though the above is also true of the colorized map view of wind speeds, with two exceptions:

                      1. “Surface” is actually a map of surface wind speeds (and not wind speeds at MSL)
                      2. “100 m / 330 ft” is a map of wind speeds 100 m above surface (AGL).
                        After those two, the local wind speeds are mapped based on the ‘fictional’ predicted speeds based on the models up to the hPa corresponding to the altitude at that location. That is to say, for Aspen, after “surface” and “100 m,” the locally displayed wind speed color shouldn’t change very much until 700 hPa (allowing for some variance within model).
                        Is that the gist of the map, as well?
                        If so, I’ll just go ahead now and say “thanks again for the help!” :)
                      Gkikas LGPZG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Gkikas LGPZG
                        Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @TChilli
                        last edited by Gkikas LGPZ

                        @TChilli
                        "Surface" is a map of wind (or temperature) at model's lowest atmospheric layer.
                        Over the ocean (or open sea) it is the same with MSL.
                        In complex terrain it may differ a lot from reality.

                        466e782e-540c-4964-88d2-396d1d5895ec-εικόνα.png

                        Also ...
                        0d8776d0-91c5-40a7-968a-b51bd9be7a55-εικόνα.png

                        Strong winds situations give even more innacurate forecasts near surface.
                        c98a9a6c-ee2d-4ed3-ad7b-70d4e5ef2c80-εικόνα.png

                        TChilliT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                        • TChilliT
                          TChilli @Gkikas LGPZ | Premium
                          last edited by TChilli

                          @Gkikas-LGPZ said in Aviation Winds Aloft on Airgram:

                          @TChilli
                          "Surface" is a map of wind (or temperature) at model's lowest atmospheric layer.
                          Over the ocean (or open sea) it is the same with MSL.
                          In complex terrain it may differ a lot from reality.

                          466e782e-540c-4964-88d2-396d1d5895ec-εικόνα.png
                          ...

                          Are those images from a book [in English or translated] that discusses specifics of weather models? If so, what’s the title/author?
                          If not, do you have recommendations for other resources you might be able to offer?
                          I’m serious about my plans to write up an “explainer” post for other people who might benefit from an “idiot’s guide” to Windy’s graphical displays, and I want to make sure I’m being accurate (but don’t want to pester you with every little question). Thanks!

                          Gkikas LGPZG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Gkikas LGPZG
                            Gkikas LGPZ Moderator @TChilli
                            last edited by

                            @TChilli
                            The images come from a paper named: "Wind Flow Models over Complex Terrain ..."
                            source: https://www2.dmu.dk/atmosphericenvironment/cost/docs/COST710-4.pdf

                            Also I propose you to sign up to MetEd (https://www.meted.ucar.edu/index.php)
                            where you'll find a lot of educational resources in meteorological topics.
                            You can use keywords (e.g. "NWP" for Numerical Weather Prediction)
                            and skill levels (e.g. "1" stands for easy) to narrow your search.
                            https://www.meted.ucar.edu/training_detail.php?topicSorting=15&languageSorting=1&module_sorting=skillLevelAsc

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                            • Gkikas LGPZG Gkikas LGPZ referenced this topic on
                            • idefix37I idefix37 referenced this topic on
                            • Gkikas LGPZG Gkikas LGPZ referenced this topic on
                            • vujacicmV
                              vujacicm @Gkikas LGPZ | Premium
                              last edited by

                              @Gkikas-LGPZ I still can not understand if Aspen has 700mb pressure, how then 1000mb can cross Aspen?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Windyty, S.E. - all rights reserved. Powered by excellent NodeBB
                              NodeBB & contributors, OSM & contributors, HERE maps
                              Terms of Use     Privacy Policy