<![CDATA[Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote.]]>Our backend guru @dzuremar finished one big task and he is eager to do some new programming action.

Please let us know, which forecast we should implement next

Vote number 1: HIRLAM approx 7.5km resolution, covers mostly Scandinavia

https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/open-data-on-aws-s3

_center_shadow

Vote number 2: AROME approx 2km resolution, covers Western Europe

https://www.umr-cnrm.fr/spip.php?article120&lang=en

_center_shadow

Vote number 3: HRRR approx 3km resolution, covers Continental USA

https://rapidrefresh.noaa.gov/hrrr/

_center_shadow

Let us know here in this discussion thread

]]>https://community.windy.com/topic/6911/which-model-should-windy-implement-next-please-voteRSS for NodeTue, 09 Jun 2026 09:41:38 GMTTue, 09 Oct 2018 06:40:23 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:05:15 GMT]]>@ivo said in Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote.:

HRRR

I would love to see HRRR (but I'm in the US, so I'm biased).

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/81140https://community.windy.com/post/81140Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:05:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:28:45 GMT]]>@ivo Hello! I would like to suggest to add SwissHD 4x4 model to Windy! It is very high resolution model witch covers almost entire Europe!

Kind Regards
Martin Bergstein

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/81133https://community.windy.com/post/81133Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:28:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:56:09 GMT]]>Australian Bureau of Meteorology ACCESS-G (Global 25km) model

http://www.bom.gov.au/australia/charts/about/about_access.shtml

cc5e494a-92ba-4c4c-b169-8296c09b631b-image.png

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/81074https://community.windy.com/post/81074Fri, 25 Jun 2021 00:56:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Wed, 23 Jun 2021 08:18:07 GMT]]>@ivo number 1

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/80922https://community.windy.com/post/80922Wed, 23 Jun 2021 08:18:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:10:17 GMT]]>@ivo ARPEGE-EU 0.1°, should be a good improvement now, most likely the best performance model at this resolution for 72h. 498d8766-8f4c-4e93-a656-40a52e9f75f4-image.png

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/80881https://community.windy.com/post/80881Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:10:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:49:21 GMT]]>Thanks for asking: Number One, we need better forecasts for the northern latitudes.

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/54561https://community.windy.com/post/54561Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:49:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:53:02 GMT]]>Please add HRRR. I’m looking to forecast thunderstorms while sailing in the North East U.S. Thanks.

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/54374https://community.windy.com/post/54374Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:53:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:19:23 GMT]]>@butragenio
This model is already offered by Windy. AROME is a limited area model, which means it is only available on its domain, i.e. a part of Europe.

70A4ABBE-D2F6-413F-85AA-49806F4BFF63.jpeg

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/54222https://community.windy.com/post/54222Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:19:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:48:14 GMT]]>Nr. 2 Arome

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/54207https://community.windy.com/post/54207Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:48:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Mon, 03 Aug 2020 20:19:22 GMT]]>Vote number 3: HRRR

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/53028https://community.windy.com/post/53028Mon, 03 Aug 2020 20:19:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Thu, 23 Jul 2020 21:01:12 GMT]]>@ivo
With the AROME model successfully implemented, do you guys have any intentions to include another global or european model at some point? Or are you more focused on other stuff to improve your already great site/app?

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/52109https://community.windy.com/post/52109Thu, 23 Jul 2020 21:01:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Sun, 15 Sep 2019 15:47:27 GMT]]>HRRR with a write-in for ICON

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/29595https://community.windy.com/post/29595Sun, 15 Sep 2019 15:47:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Sat, 14 Sep 2019 12:20:46 GMT]]>@ivo Vote 3

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/29546https://community.windy.com/post/29546Sat, 14 Sep 2019 12:20:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:48:00 GMT]]>I vote for number 3. Thanks for everything. The app is great. My go to app for additional information when voyage planning.

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/29495https://community.windy.com/post/29495Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:48:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Thu, 07 Mar 2019 16:32:20 GMT]]>Vote number 2: AROME

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/19748https://community.windy.com/post/19748Thu, 07 Mar 2019 16:32:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Thu, 07 Mar 2019 07:01:21 GMT]]>@du-Chazaud
AROME est déjà disponible sur Windy !!
AROME is already available on Windy.

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/19735https://community.windy.com/post/19735Thu, 07 Mar 2019 07:01:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Wed, 06 Mar 2019 21:13:12 GMT]]>Je préférerais AROME
MERCI.
Antoine à Versailles

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/19732https://community.windy.com/post/19732Wed, 06 Mar 2019 21:13:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:45:44 GMT]]>I vote for VOTE 3

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/19594https://community.windy.com/post/19594Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:45:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:05:39 GMT]]>Vote #1: HIRLAM

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/19185https://community.windy.com/post/19185Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:05:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Wed, 13 Feb 2019 22:43:58 GMT]]>HRRR would be great!

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/19050https://community.windy.com/post/19050Wed, 13 Feb 2019 22:43:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Wed, 13 Feb 2019 03:24:12 GMT]]>Well, seeing as I'm in continental US...

#3 HRRR is my vote

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/19001https://community.windy.com/post/19001Wed, 13 Feb 2019 03:24:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:56:35 GMT]]>HRRR would be a fantastic addition for North American users!

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/19000https://community.windy.com/post/19000Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:56:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:17:38 GMT]]>@ivo

Hello!
Do you have some info about Arome model for the locations I showed on the map above? I thought it was the same data source? (caribbean, pacific, tahiti...)

Thx :)
Gabriel

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/18463https://community.windy.com/post/18463Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:17:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote. on Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:02:04 GMT]]>The Candian model is actually very good, and just as free and available as GFS. It outranked GFS in accuracy, at least in the last article I read. I'd love to find a better source of accuracy-ranking for NWP models if anyone knows of one. Also, the UK Met Office have now started putting the output of their Unified Model on AWS. The UM ranks just behind ECMWF, it's a great model. The data on AWS is 24 hours behind, but this shows their progress in data dissemination. Not sure what costs would be involved but check out this as an FYI:

https://github.com/MetOffice/aws-earth-examples/blob/master/README.md

As far as AROME vs HIRLAM, I'd say AROME is the way to go :)

]]>https://community.windy.com/post/18091https://community.windy.com/post/18091Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:02:04 GMT