Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote.

[SoloTiempo]

Number 1: HIRLAM

[IsaacVilà]

Vote for AROME!!

[polverari]

I vote 2. tks

[bkquang]

Vote for windy

[veekay365]

My vote goes to AROME

[sk 0]

AROME i vote for

[autoTAF]

no doubt. AROME No. 2.

[Stoner65]

Vote number 2

[joanm]

Arome! Seems to be the best for western europe high res

[clazzygurl]

I vote #3 HRRR

[mohamed salah]

number 3

[Taigajoe]

Vote 1: HIRLAM

[lourda]

I Vote Number 2: AROME

[Marco01]

Vote 2: AROME

[lucc31]

Vote 2 : Arome

[yannick.foin]

Vote 2: AROME

[Antonio Espejo]

Arome please. Since this model solves convection much better than others (not only for the high resolution) , It works really well to ferecast thermal seabreezes in my area, goood for kiting and surfing..

By the way, wave forecast could be really improved if different colormap is aplied, arrows would also improve the visualization. This is only my hymble opinion, but better wave maps is the thing I miss more from windy.

Your work is really appreciated WINDY team,

All the best!!!

[la varangue]

@ivo i vote nimber 2

[Tjkbrown]

Vote number 2: AROME

[Gabou971]

@ivo Yes AROME is open data as far as I know and the resolution is awesome. ARPEGE as well. The "bad" thing with Arpege is that the resolution depends on the region due ta a very specific computation method. It is about 7.5km in Europe but 37km in New Zealand for exemple:

This is an exemple of the wind accumulation from the AROME model just before hurricane Maria hit Dominica last year (wind in Km/h):