Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote.
-
@ivo Yes AROME is open data as far as I know and the resolution is awesome. ARPEGE as well. The "bad" thing with Arpege is that the resolution depends on the region due ta a very specific computation method. It is about 7.5km in Europe but 37km in New Zealand for exemple:
This is an exemple of the wind accumulation from the AROME model just before hurricane Maria hit Dominica last year (wind in Km/h):
-
@ivo
#3 HRRR definitely.Love your app and all the work you put in.
-
Number 3
-
Vote number 3: HRRR please
-
Vote N.3 HRRR
-
Vote number 2: AROME
-
Vote number 1: HIRLAM approx 7.5km resolution
-
@ivo
Vote number 2: AROME -
Windy should implement #3 next
-
I would vote 3
-
Vote number 1: HIRLAM
-
Vote number 1: HIRLAM
-
I vote #1 for Scandinavia. Norway's very long and jagged coast pierced all along with long fjords surrounded by complex mounains, makes it some of the most difficult areas in the world to forecast. This is also why Norwegian meterological institute is one of the most regarded forecasters. Check out www.yr.no
Which models they use I don't know, but better forecasting of Scandinavia and especially Western parts is highly needed -
@antonio-espejo said in Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote.:
By the way, wave forecast could be really improved if different colormap is aplied, arrows would also improve the visualization. This is only my hymble opinion, but better wave maps is the thing I miss more from windy.
You can modify by yourself the color palet of the wave map.
On the website, select Settings > Modify layers colors > Waves
You may change the colors and the steps of the wave heights range. -
HIRLAM Vote for number one ..
-
HRRR hands down. Surtout si le Canada est couvert. Merci Windy.
-
I would like HIRLAM.
-
Vote number 3: HRRR
-
VOTE #3 - HRRR
-
Vote #3 HRRR
