Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote.
-
@ivo said in Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote.:
Number 2 -
Of those HIRLAM. However, how about offering the new FV3 variant of GFS ?
-
AROME !!!!
-
Vote 2 Arome
-
Vote 2 AROME
-
@ivo Can I vote to have back the 3D? If so, I vote for having back the 3D.
-
@jwayne : Ditto!!!
-
AROME would be nice
-
Vote 2: AROME
-
Vote 1: HIRLAM
-
@igor-320 said in Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote.:
Vote 1: HIRLAM
-
I would like to see better coverage of the Asia Pacific and Oceania regions. It covers a large part of the planet, but everyone sees focussed on the US or Europe. Being a professional yacht delivery skipper most of my work is in this area. From this limited choice I go for Arome #2 as it at least covers New Caledonia. I would like to see ICON for more global coverage.
-
@ivo HRRR all the way
-
@ivo said in Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote.:
Vote number 3: HRRR approx 3km resolution, covers Continental USA
-
Whatever happened to 3D windy, watching the wind in the global model made more sense, or do you guys have flat Earthers working there now?
-
3 as it could improve the forecast for the Atlantic coast as well.
-
I Vote number 3: HRRR approx 3km resolution, covers Continental USA!
-
3 please!
And, if it's not too much to ask...how about the Continental version of the Canadian HRDPS?
Or at least the LAM-West version for all us skiers in western canada and the Pacific Northwest?!!!!!Great work you guys...keep it up!
dj
-
VOTE 1: HIRLAM
-
Vote 2: AROME
Would allow (in Western Europe) forecast that takes into account quite local conditions (valleys, etc).
