Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote.
-
The Candian model is actually very good, and just as free and available as GFS. It outranked GFS in accuracy, at least in the last article I read. I'd love to find a better source of accuracy-ranking for NWP models if anyone knows of one. Also, the UK Met Office have now started putting the output of their Unified Model on AWS. The UM ranks just behind ECMWF, it's a great model. The data on AWS is 24 hours behind, but this shows their progress in data dissemination. Not sure what costs would be involved but check out this as an FYI:
https://github.com/MetOffice/aws-earth-examples/blob/master/README.md
As far as AROME vs HIRLAM, I'd say AROME is the way to go :)
-
Hello!
Do you have some info about Arome model for the locations I showed on the map above? I thought it was the same data source? (caribbean, pacific, tahiti...)Thx :)
Gabriel -
HRRR would be a fantastic addition for North American users!
-
Well, seeing as I'm in continental US...
#3 HRRR is my vote
-
HRRR would be great!
-
Vote #1: HIRLAM
-
I vote for VOTE 3
-
Je préférerais AROME
MERCI.
Antoine à Versailles -
@du-Chazaud
AROME est déjà disponible sur Windy !!
AROME is already available on Windy. -
Vote number 2: AROME
-
I vote for number 3. Thanks for everything. The app is great. My go to app for additional information when voyage planning.
-
@ivo Vote 3
-
HRRR with a write-in for ICON
-
@ivo
With the AROME model successfully implemented, do you guys have any intentions to include another global or european model at some point? Or are you more focused on other stuff to improve your already great site/app? -
Vote number 3: HRRR
-
Nr. 2 Arome
-
@butragenio
This model is already offered by Windy. AROME is a limited area model, which means it is only available on its domain, i.e. a part of Europe.
-
Please add HRRR. I’m looking to forecast thunderstorms while sailing in the North East U.S. Thanks.
-
Thanks for asking: Number One, we need better forecasts for the northern latitudes.
-
@ivo ARPEGE-EU 0.1°, should be a good improvement now, most likely the best performance model at this resolution for 72h.
