Which model should Windy implement next? Please vote.
-
Voting for #3 as rapid refresh for severe storm tracking is extremely helpful.
I also want to say that you guys have added a lot of awesome features recently, please keep up the good work. You are my go to 100% of the time.
-
vote numero 2 AROME
-
Vote 2: AROME for the coastline/mountain modeling
-
Eu voto por o numero 2.
Agradeço pela qualidade e o trabalho magnifico que fazem.
-
Vote 2: AROME
-
AROME :)
-
Vote 1 : HIRLAM
-
Arome. Thanks. :)
-
Vote 1: HIRLAM
-
@lotfi-ghazouani
With the presentation of the 3 models that Windy could implement, there are 3 maps which show the domain that these models cover :https://community.windy.com/topic/6911/which-model-should-windy-implement-next-please-vote
And Ivo precises the domain of each of them:
HIRLAM covers Scandinavia (and more)
AROME covers a part of Western Europe
HRRR covers USAThese 3 models are not global models like ECMWF and GFS
-
@lotfi-ghazouani
Keep in mind that only HIRLAM covers part of Tunisia.
-
@ivo
I vote for No.1 HIRLAM
just to check how this model predicts weather in the Mediterranean
although resolution of 7 km is similar to ECMWF and ICON.Do you have plans for COSMO model ?
http://www.cosmo-model.org/content/default.htm
-
I do personally vote for AROME, because I spend a lot of time in Alps
-
I vote for AROME.
-
Vote 2: Arome
-
Arome, the best model for coastal sailing, kiting ...
-
Vote 2: AROME
-
definitely nr 2: AROME
-
Vote number 2: AROME approx 2km resolution, covers Western Europe
-
Vote 2: AROME
