windy-plugin-skewt now running with ECMWF data
Haha thanks @rittels! Seems the only issue was my impatience. It's working now. :)
Gkikas LGPZ last edited by
thankyou for your development work on the SkewT plugin.....I have been waiting a while for this addition to the Windy project.
Could I highlight one fault with your plugin and I believe it has to do with the date time used in the SkewT plot not being the same as the Windy background time display.
1/ In the top image (for time 950hpa wind field at 2200local /12Z), the SkewT wind at 950hpa is ~080/45kts.
2/ When I skipped ahead by three time steps (or advanced ahead by 9 hours - see bottom image for 0700local/ 21Z ), I found that the SkewT diagram was now indicating a 950hpa wind of 080/20kt.
a/ The wind field display at the pointer location within the 21Z frame indicates a strong wind 080/45kt. This displayed an inconsistency with the SkewT 950hpa wind 080/20kt for the same time step.
3/ It appears that the wind speed at 950hpa on the SkewT display for the Windy time step 12Z, coincided with the 950hpa wind field image at the pointer location for Windy 21Z display time.
In other words, the SkewT display/time stamp is 9 hours ahead of the Windy display/time stamp.
I looked closer at this because I found inconsistencies with the T/Td trace compared to the displayed cloud fields.
I tested this with other time steps and areas where winds changed noticeably in speed and direction and found the same inconsistency.
Please take a look at your programming. I hope you can see this and are able to rectify this.......I would love to be able to continuing using this plugin.
in addition to my post above, I have just noticed that when running the mouse cursor across the SkewT image, the layer wind/temp/press details are not consistent with the cursor location. It seems like the cursor is offset by about 2cm below the data point it is displaying.
Hi @stitch ,
Thanks for the comments and the in-depth look into this. I've actually had this reported to me by another user, and the issue should be fixed. Is the plugin loading as version 0.2.6? The isobar labels should be green in this version.
I've got in touch with a developer who's going to help out with some of the coding, and plan to have a robust plugin by version 1.0. As a meteorologist, I'm learning the dev side of things as I go, so patience is appreciated; as are the bug reports. I'll look into your comments in more detail when I have the chance, but for now please make sure you're using version 0.2.6, as the specific issues you mention should have been fixed.
It is possible that you are referring to me in your last comment ?
I have released
windy-plugin-soundinga few days ago.
I took inspiration from your plugin for the computation of the adiabatic lines - thanks :)
You can check the code at https://github.com/vicb/windy-plugin-sounding
It's still an early version.
My plan is to make the code more modular. Maybe we could work on some common components.
Let me know when you have time for pairing on that.
@vicb yes I was referring to you. Definitely let's chat soon, it would be good to avoid overlap. How do I load the plugin? I can't find it anywhere in the menu (Same problem you had haha).
I was using 0.2.5 and will now switch over 0.2.6.
Thx for your work from a fellow meteorologist!
@johnckealy right click anywhere on the map and select (the bottom most item) "Better sounding"