<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Geopotential isolines bug likely]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">A bug?  Geopotential isolines do not change when a change the model, from ECMWF to GFS. It seems that ECMWF isolines are displayed whatever model you choose.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/8135/geopotential-isolines-bug-likely</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 12:32:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/8135.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 19:01:36 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Geopotential isolines bug likely on Thu, 11 Apr 2019 20:41:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/giodolif" aria-label="Profile: giodolif">@<bdi>giodolif</bdi></a><br />
You are right. The Geopotential isolines, or isohypses, work well when ECMWF is selected. Switching to GFS, the isolines are still those of ECMWF with the GFS overlay .<br />
<a href="https://community.windy.com/topic/5577/display-isolines-does-not-switch-between-layers">https://community.windy.com/topic/5577/display-isolines-does-not-switch-between-layers</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/20664</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/20664</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 20:41:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>