Windy Community
    • Unread
    • Categories
    • Groups
    • Go to windy.com
    • Register
    • Login

    Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) data and forecast are now accessible on Windy.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Articles
    articlecopernicusnew featurenew
    21 Posts 12 Posters 110.1k Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Gkikas LGPZG Offline
      Gkikas LGPZ Moderator Meteorologist @история
      last edited by Gkikas LGPZ

      @Андрей-Бирюков
      I think is important that a large organization (Copernicus)
      trusts a small start-up (Windy)
      to provide air quality data to the general public in a user-friendly way.

      Also https://www.who.int/airpollution/ru/

      Gkikas LGPZG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
      • Gkikas LGPZG Offline
        Gkikas LGPZ Moderator Meteorologist @Gkikas LGPZ
        last edited by

        It is important for me to observe that NOx gases (air quality) occur
        not only in large cities (because of high motor vehicle traffic).
        COPERNICUS data shows high concentrations also along merchant ship routes
        and airline routes (flight paths).

        e0eded7d-6388-4f79-ac4e-a3a8e7e58c7d-εικόνα.png

        Gkikas LGPZG vhp_camsV 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 5
        • Gkikas LGPZG Offline
          Gkikas LGPZ Moderator Meteorologist @Gkikas LGPZ
          last edited by

          Also I want to inform the community that aerosol data (Atmospheric Optical Depth-AOD)
          is highly correlated to reduced visibility (because of haze or dust).
          61c89df8-1717-452f-ba89-5628d1ca9166-εικόνα.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
          • vhp_camsV Offline
            vhp_cams @Gkikas LGPZ
            last edited by

            Hi @Gkikas-LGPZ. I am Vincent-Henri and am in charge of CAMS. What you see on this layer is NO2 concentration at the surface. You rightly point to ship tracks over the Atlantic, Mediterranean. Over the Black Sea, these are also ship tracks, not flight paths. The lines that you point in Russia are motorways (M-11 between Moscow and St Petersburg or M-9 going westwards from Moscow to Latvia). Only a small fraction of NO2 emitted by aircraft make it to the ground directly: this is mostly near airports due to take-off & landing; NO2 emissions by aircraft at cruise level mostly get back to the ground through deposition of HNO3 and would not appear as lines at the surface. I hope this helps!

            Gkikas LGPZG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 10
            • Gkikas LGPZG Offline
              Gkikas LGPZ Moderator Meteorologist @vhp_cams
              last edited by

              @vhp_cams
              Thank you very much for the definitions!
              Unfortunatelly, I haven't noticed that it is a surface concentration.
              My fault.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ivoI Offline
                ivo Windy Staff
                last edited by

                I just strongly suggest to change colors of Ozone layers. High DU is now yellow which people read like BAD, while low DU are blue, which leaves people calm.

                Gkikas LGPZG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Gkikas LGPZG Offline
                  Gkikas LGPZ Moderator Meteorologist @ivo
                  last edited by

                  @ivo
                  There is "good" and "bad" ozone!
                  Near ground level ozone is an atmospheric pollutant
                  while stratospheric ozone (in the ozone layer) filters out sunlight
                  preventing damaging UV light from reaching the Earth's surface.

                  ivoI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • carsocarC Offline
                    carsocar
                    last edited by

                    Great job! Amazing data

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ivoI Offline
                      ivo Windy Staff @Gkikas LGPZ
                      last edited by

                      @Gkikas-LGPZ OK so which ozone we display now? The upper or lower one?

                      Gkikas LGPZG TZT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Gkikas LGPZG Offline
                        Gkikas LGPZ Moderator Meteorologist @ivo
                        last edited by Gkikas LGPZ

                        @ivo total column. For "every day use" I think UV radiation forecast is more useful as it takes into account not only ozone but also clouds and aerosol particles.
                        Also https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/discovair

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • Orion73064O Offline
                          Orion73064
                          last edited by

                          Standing Ovation from me to Windy & CAMS on their Merger!
                          I definitely will support & donate when I can to keep such an excellent platform on air! ;)

                          TZT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • TZT Offline
                            TZ Windy Staff @Orion73064
                            last edited by

                            @Orion73064 Thank you!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • TZT Offline
                              TZ Windy Staff @ivo
                              last edited by

                              @ivo We display total column of ozone, especially for monitoring of ozone holes = "the area where ozone columns are less than 220 Dobson Units (DU)". Antarctic ozone hole is seasonal. According to Copernicus, 2018's ozone hole "was one of the largest holes of recent years". Full article about 2018 Antarctic ozone hole season: https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/2018-antarctic-ozone-hole-season

                              GrantWilsonG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • idefix37I Offline
                                idefix37 Sailor Moderator
                                last edited by idefix37

                                Could anyone explain why there is such a concentration of NO2 between the French coast and Corsica when selecting the CAMS 40km model compared to the CAMS EU 10km model? In the observed case the difference is about 10 times higher.
                                How can a model of low resolution (40km) show figures so high that a model of higher resolution (10km) does not detect. While the regional multi-models ensemble used by CAMS EU does not operate in the same way as the CAMS global model, these differences seems to be a bias.
                                We know there are many ferries and big cruise ships between the coast and Corsica, but what content of NO2 should be considered in this region?
                                (I have observed these big differences for several days now, and same issue in Algeria and Tunisia).

                                7026E12C-5C5B-46C9-B490-4E34A98F9EFA.jpeg

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • GrantWilsonG Offline
                                  GrantWilson @TZ
                                  last edited by GrantWilson

                                  @ TZ said in Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) data and forecast are now accessible on Windy.:

                                  @ ivo We display total column of ozone, for monitoring of ozone holes = "the area where ozone columns are less than 220 Dobson Units (DU)". Antarctic ozone hole is seasonal. According to Copernicus, 2018's ozone hole "was one of the largest holes of recent years". Full article about 2018 Antarctic ozone hole season: https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/2018-antarctic-ozone-hole-season-get essay-charts

                                  Hi,
                                  It's obviously one of the most alarming statements I have ever read. I check the ozone forecast charts predictions daily. Here's the reference to the ozone layer monitoring and the graphics updated on a daily basis: https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/monitoring-ozone-layer

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  Windy Community  |  Powered by excellent NodeBB
                                  Terms of Use     Privacy Policy     Windy.com