<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Is it possible to add NOAA weather model to the list of models?. I found through manual comparison that the NAM model at windy is better for mountains in pacific northwest area of united states, but it does not always match the forecast this NOAA link (see below) which seems even more accurate.</p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/forecast/wxtables/index.php?wfo=sew" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/forecast/wxtables/index.php?wfo=sew</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/topic/9903/add-ndfs-noaa-model-to-list-of-models-in-windy</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 23:30:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.windy.com/topic/9903.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 22:14:35 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:14:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gkikas-lgpz" aria-label="Profile: Gkikas-LGPZ">@<bdi>Gkikas-LGPZ</bdi></a> -</p>
<p dir="auto">It looks like the Web site URL is different for different regions (local weather), but all of them are linked if u start at <a href="https://www.weather.gov/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.weather.gov/</a>.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31973</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31973</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[blahdi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:14:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Wed, 23 Oct 2019 04:36:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/blahdi" aria-label="Profile: blahdi">@<bdi>blahdi</bdi></a><br />
The site you mentioned, says:<br />
"This Interface only works for Western Region National Weather Service Offices."</p>
<p dir="auto">Is it available only for NorthWest USA?</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31928</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31928</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gkikas LGPZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 04:36:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Tue, 22 Oct 2019 16:11:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/ivo" aria-label="Profile: ivo">@<bdi>ivo</bdi></a> - its really good, specifically in the mountains or areas surrounded by mountains (e.g in the puget sound (its a bay) as well since it is in the convergence zone due to mountains).. For cities (without much impact of mountains), many sources should work..</p>
<p dir="auto">NDFD is used by National Weather Service -  US govt official weather site - if u see banner above, it says NWS and  NOAA below it.<br />
<a href="https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/forecast/wxtables/index.php?wfo=sew" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.wrh.noaa.gov/forecast/wxtables/index.php?wfo=sew</a></p>
<p dir="auto">GFS is really bad <strong>for mountains or mountain affected terrains</strong>  -</p>
<p dir="auto">NAM is acceptable, but NDFS is much better than NAM.</p>
<p dir="auto">You can search for a posts by a renowned weather scientist called "cliffmass" from Pacific Northwest. He has blogs on major problems with US govt published models. Unfortunately, the models do not publish their historic accuracy numbers for different terrains, and hence get away with inaccuracies. There was startup which compared the accuracies of different models for cities - and they reported one of the apps as more reliable. But, afaik, there hasn't been such a accuracy study done for mountains and water.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31870</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31870</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[blahdi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 16:11:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Tue, 22 Oct 2019 08:24:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/blahdi" aria-label="Profile: blahdi">@<bdi>blahdi</bdi></a> Is this NDFS so good? Which website uses it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31840</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31840</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ivo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 08:24:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:14:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/idefix37" aria-label="Profile: idefix37">@<bdi>idefix37</bdi></a> - this makes sense.</p>
<p dir="auto">Windy team - can u pls respond when u get the chance? hoping it is as simple as adding a new URL for NDFD data. I can help u beta test it.</p>
<p dir="auto">I know NWS web site (based on NDFD data) is popular among outdoor enthusiasts - mountaineering and sea kayaking.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31818</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31818</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[blahdi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:14:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:07:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/blahdi" aria-label="Profile: blahdi">@<bdi>blahdi</bdi></a><br />
NDFD data seem available as GRIB files, but I don’t know whether Windy team is willing to add these data.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31817</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31817</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:07:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:33:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/idefix37" aria-label="Profile: idefix37">@<bdi>idefix37</bdi></a></p>
<p dir="auto">Thank u for clarifying. This probably explains why it is relatively more accurate than NAM.</p>
<p dir="auto">One question: Even if it is human involved and ensemble of models, do they store the 'output' data in such a way that it can be parsed by Windy? Presumably, NWS web site must be parsing the same output data to show on their web site?</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31815</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31815</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[blahdi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:33:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:18:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/blahdi" aria-label="Profile: blahdi">@<bdi>blahdi</bdi></a><br />
OK NDFD is not a model but an ensemble of models reviewed by meteorologists. Some additional information<br />
<a href="https://luckgrib.com/models/ndfd_conus/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://luckgrib.com/models/ndfd_conus/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31814</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31814</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 19:18:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 18:39:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/idefix37" aria-label="Profile: idefix37">@<bdi>idefix37</bdi></a></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="https://www.weather.gov/mdl/ndfd_data_grid" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.weather.gov/mdl/ndfd_data_grid</a></p>
<p dir="auto">As per someone from NOAA, (he is not part of dept that owns that web site), the web site uses the model at link above. Its called National Digital Forecast Database.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31812</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31812</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[blahdi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 18:39:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:26:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/idefix37" aria-label="Profile: idefix37">@<bdi>idefix37</bdi></a> , I have sent email to NOAA asking this question. I do not know offhand which specific model that web site shows - in general, i have observed a few times (since I use both Windy-NAM and NOAA web site) that it is different than NAM.</p>
<p dir="auto">I will let u know as soon as I get a response. Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31795</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31795</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[blahdi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:26:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:58:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/blahdi" aria-label="Profile: blahdi">@<bdi>blahdi</bdi></a><br />
This is the list of NOAA’s models:<br />
<a href="https://nomads.ncep.noaa.gov/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://nomads.ncep.noaa.gov/</a><br />
Which one do you want?</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31784</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31784</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[idefix37]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:58:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Sat, 19 Oct 2019 20:53:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/squiby" aria-label="Profile: squiby">@<bdi>squiby</bdi></a> GFS is not the model used on NOAA web site I listed. GFS is mostly inaccurate in the mountains.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31684</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31684</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[blahdi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 20:53:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Add NDFS NOAA model to list of models in Windy? on Sat, 19 Oct 2019 16:45:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The NOAA model is already included with Windy. It’s known as the GFS model.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.windy.com/post/31675</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.windy.com/post/31675</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[squiby]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 16:45:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>