@alamos_gmbh can be closed, we used the wrong library path.

@alamos_gmbh can be closed, we used the wrong library path.

Hi,
we get an 404 Error for some days when using the windy leaflet plugin:

https://www.windy.com/v/36.0.0.lib.cc7c/plugins/gl-tile-render.js
GET
Status Code 404

This is a new error, we did not change anything. We are are PRO user.

Thanks in advance.

@Suty okay, thank you.

Hello,

I am a professional maps forecast user (without ECWMF). I embedded the leaflet maps plugin. Everything is working fine, but I cannot find the overlay "weather radar" (like here: https://embed.windy.com/config/map). I only find "rain & thunder", which is similar, but not the same.
The api says that radar is not inside the allowedOverlays array.
Is there a possibility to get the weather radar data or is it only available with ECWMF data?
A lack of coverage should not be the issue (Germany).

Thanks in advance!

Hi,
we would like a refund for our professional licence, which we purchased a couple of days ago.
Reason:
We bought the professional licence to get access to the radar layer. In our tests, it worked. Later, we found out, that this was a bug and the radar layer is not part of the professional licence.
For this reason, we cannot use windy.
See:
https://community.windy.com/topic/26385/invalid-value-for-overlay-radar/6?_=1688477807296

Thanks

@Ondřej-Šutera Oh this is really unfortunate. We are using the windy api for fire fighters and this layer was the reason, why we purchased the professional licence.
Is there an offical list, which layers we can use and which not?

@Ondřej-Šutera Thanks for the answer!
Is there a similar layer for thunderstorms in the professional licence or do we need in addition to that the 1000€ ECMF licence to get access to radar layer?

Hi,
we are using the professional licence for windy.com an try to load the "radar" layer:

We get the following error:

No products available for overlay "radar" using your API key. Original products: radar
Invalid value for overlay, radar

The weird thing is, the layer actually works. It displays some data:

Is this a bug?