Two issues:

• On the legend, the scale switches from "in" on the left to "3ft" (3 feet?) on the right. This is inaccurate because the color scale seems to top out at 3 inches. This is also an issue for metric units, as it says "mm" on the left and "1m" on the right.
• Secondly, the color scale is inadequate for heavy rains. The pink sections cover a huge range of rain totals, with everything from about 8 to 20 inches (about 200 to 450mm) looking fully saturated pink. The scale should be more spread out!

@korina Thanks for the insight. Considering you use HRRR as well, why wouldn't you offer different smoke models along with Copernicus?

HRRR has a full smoke prediction model, and it seems weird that it's left out of Windy

You can see it here: https://hwp-viz.gsd.esrl.noaa.gov/smoke/index.html

and source data here:
https://rapidrefresh.noaa.gov/RAPsmoke/

for example:

Two issues:

• On the legend, the scale switches from "in" on the left to "3ft" (3 feet?) on the right. This is inaccurate because the color scale seems to top out at 3 inches. This is also an issue for metric units, as it says "mm" on the left and "1m" on the right.
• Secondly, the color scale is inadequate for heavy rains. The pink sections cover a huge range of rain totals, with everything from about 8 to 20 inches (about 200 to 450mm) looking fully saturated pink. The scale should be more spread out!

@korina Thanks for the insight. Considering you use HRRR as well, why wouldn't you offer different smoke models along with Copernicus?

You can see it here: https://hwp-viz.gsd.esrl.noaa.gov/smoke/index.html

and source data here:
https://rapidrefresh.noaa.gov/RAPsmoke/

for example:

HRRR has a full smoke prediction model, and it seems weird that it's left out of Windy