Posts made by cc cc 6

Rain and rain accumulation also show different values. The path of the showers is different between these two tabs.

seems all model have the same problem:

Accumulated gust:

Wind gust:

Why do Windy UKV "Wind Gust Accumulation" and "Wind Gust" show different max wind gust values? The pointers all show the same location.

"Wind Gust Accumulation" 4 pm to 10 pm get maximum 72KT

Wind gust 4pm to 10pm get maximum 54KT

@Filip_K Great. I will check the radar later whether it is accurate when the next typhoon approach Philippine. However, the radar problem in Golf of Tonkin still haven't fix. There are two swirls on the sea.

The animation in Radar+ is buggy.

Also, please allow us to switch off the animation (optical flow) between frames. It doesn't look great since it does not distinguish the movement between high, medium, and low clouds. The movement of clouds at different heights is not the same, but your animation simulates all clouds moving in the same direction.

The windy radar image in philipine is not the same with the PAGASA official webiste. Look at the Tropical Storm's eye location, which one correct?

@cc-cc-6 typo: not 05w, should be 04w.

I have been reporting this issue for over a year, but it remains unresolved. I believe almost all radar alignments and image sizes across Asia have problems.

@Suty There is animation between each satellite image and radar image. I don't want the animation. It simulates the cloud and rain movement between each image in different time, but don't distinguish low, med, high cloud.

How do I switch off optical flow for satellite images? Your optical flow can't distinguish between low, medium, and high clouds, which confuses me.

At least the Gulf of Tonkin in Vietnam, for the current version, obviously to have some of the radar displaced or images seriously diminished in size.

Last year, the northern part of the South China Sea also displaced to the south or was slightly enlarged a bit (I guess). I don't know whether this was corrected in the current version.

The Northern Hemisphere tropical cyclone season will soon start. When a strong TC forms a clear eye, then we will find out which radar is displaced when compare to satellite.

But the most important thing for now is to please add back the option for disabling optical flow so that I can easily distinguish the movement of low, mid, and high clouds in the satellite view. Thanks

The optical flow option for radar and satellite is missing in the setting. Your optical flow does not distinguish between low cloud, mid cloud, and high cloud, which is very disruptive for me when determining TC position.

On the other hand, I do not use your radar for TC positioning because I know that many of your radar images in less developed countries / failed states and East Asia are displaced, which do not meet my requirements as a perfectionist. Therefore, whether your optical flow on radar is mandatory or not will have no impact on me.