@korina the vector map layer is outdated.

Glacier tongues are currently still part of the landmass, but where they melt, an elongated fjord remains in places.
If you don't believe it, just zoom in to the north coast of Greenland.
But this small inaccuracy is probably blamed on the supplier of the map material. Am I right?

Large-scale failure of the radar data for about 8 hours now.

@korina This is a bug. I just wanted to report it.
If you don't like bug reports, write clean code and don't blame users.
I switch to [https://kachelmannwetter.com/]
Bye!

@idefix37 So you've lost your sense of humor. I'm terribly sorry that you can't stand it when I publicly quote two numbers, as anyone can read them on windy.com.
That really makes me laugh my head off!

ECWMF says 99 km/h
ICON-D2 says 133 km/h

A dice is more precise.

I only report replicable bugs.
I can't post them here.
I've found 2 so far.
Posted them in the publicly available section.

If windy.com reports 135 and 98 km/h, this is serious!

@korina helped me by suggesting to reduce the file size of pictures, so that I can upload them. There seems to be a limit of 1 MB or so.
That was helpful. So I tried to click on the thumbs-up icon in her message.
windy.com tells me, that I can't upvote my own post.
Well, thank you!

:-)

@korina Looks like there's a maximum of 1 MB or so for uploading screenshots.
Thank you for the hint.
It's not a bug. My Screen is just too big :-)

I click on a point in the map for wind accumulation.
I use ICON-D2 model, but I'm not sure, if this bug is in all models.
I see 135 km/h. I assume, that this is the maximum wind gusts speed.
I then click on the arrow to see the detailed forecast for this point.
There I see a maximum of 96 km/h for wind gusts.