Okay thanks, in the verification I showed the RMSE scores (GZ 500 HPA) are calculated gainst the north american radiosonde observation network. The cmglb is in red is the GEM GDPS canadian global model.
Posts made by Chic-Nic
-
RE: Canadian GEM Inclusion
-
RE: Canadian GEM Inclusion
Thanks for the model comparison over another region and with different lead times. Not sur if the varification is made against oservations or analysis, in any case this confirms that having GEM model to look at with windy over NOAM would be added value.
-
RE: Canadian GEM Inclusion
Meteorological Service of Canada Open Data
Here is where to get the data if you would consider making it available in the faboulous viewer that you have developed:
-
RE: Canadian GEM Inclusion
GEM RDPS is the High Regional Deterministic Prediction System
GEM HRDPS is the High Resolution Deterministic Prediction System
Both are run 4 times a day -
RE: Canadian GEM Inclusion
Yes I would like to go premium but would benefit from canadian model GEM GDPS (Global Deterministic Prediction Models) 240hrs at 15 km that competes advantageously wint GFS over NOAM as one may see with red line (cmcglb = GEM GDPS) international model verifications
Also the GEM RDPS 84 hours at 10 km resolution and the GEM HRDPS 48 hours at 2,5 km resolution are very usefull over canada where the US NAM is at 12 km resolutin and HRRR at 3 km resolution with limited coverage over canada
-
Canadian Model
Canadian Model HRDPS available at 2.5 km resolution over all of noam for 48 hrs fcst and runs every 6 hours. Is it possible to add this option?