@Ondřej-Šutera I am also having this problem. I will add more detail. On the layers for Currents and Tidal Currents, the lower left shows the time represented on the display, such as "Friday 2 - 0:00" and a "Play" icon. Clicking the Play icon changes it to Pause, but the display does not progress. Nor is it possible to move the time shown by dragging along the bar. This only affects Currents; wind and wave both display the timeline as expected. This behaviour occurs on Windows 10, Chrome and Firefox, and Chrome on Android. Thank you.

@korina

As I read that display, it's showing clearly defined patches of lying snow, 3m deep, with quite sharply defined and sometimes straight edges that don't follow the terrain. That's not what I expect to see at this time of year, snow should be mostly on the mountains and with the depth tapering off gradually. If it showed 3cm of snow like that, fine, but 3m is a typical winter accumulation. So I think there's an error.

@idefix37 - thanks, understood.

@Ondřej-Šutera I am also having this problem. I will add more detail. On the layers for Currents and Tidal Currents, the lower left shows the time represented on the display, such as "Friday 2 - 0:00" and a "Play" icon. Clicking the Play icon changes it to Pause, but the display does not progress. Nor is it possible to move the time shown by dragging along the bar. This only affects Currents; wind and wave both display the timeline as expected. This behaviour occurs on Windows 10, Chrome and Firefox, and Chrome on Android. Thank you.

@idefix37 - thanks, understood.

@korina
Thanks - if you're happy with it, OK. I thought 'new snow' was forecast (and the display shows how many days accumulation), and 'snow depth' was historic accumulation in the model, as there's no timescale on the display. It is in the general area of the Alps, but the patches cover the valleys as well as the mountains so I though it was a modelling artifact.

Happy to close it out as bug, if you wish.

@korina

As I read that display, it's showing clearly defined patches of lying snow, 3m deep, with quite sharply defined and sometimes straight edges that don't follow the terrain. That's not what I expect to see at this time of year, snow should be mostly on the mountains and with the depth tapering off gradually. If it showed 3cm of snow like that, fine, but 3m is a typical winter accumulation. So I think there's an error.

Snow depth in Europe is shown as 3m deep in sharp-edged blocks