If the subscription price of Windy will not increase in the future, I think I will be a subscription user of Windy for a long time.

As the title suggests, the compare forecasts in version 46, there is no longer a "reference time". The reference time of the weather model is very important for weather forecasters, especially in the comparison of different weather models. It is even more important to understand the reference time of each model before viewing the results of each weather model output, and we hope to be able to make a comeback!

I also noticed this change in version 46, which removed the display of clouds and precipitation in Airgram. It is very inconvenient for analyzing weather because it requires switching back and forth between Meteogram and Airgram. Sometimes there is no need to update just for the sake of updating something, and Airgram in version 45 is quite good.
In addition, I also noticed that the weather icon in the Meteogram in version 46 has become smaller, which may be some unnecessary changes as it looks less coordinated and aesthetically pleasing.

@Suty In the new version, the 'Reference time' has also been lost, which is a very important data. I hope it can be restored.

I have modified the color scale of the Precip. type. However, the default color scale is still displayed in the web version, whether in the computer(fig. 1) or mobile browser(fig. 2), but my own color scale can be displayed normally in the android app (fig.3)(version 33.0.5)

I've tried many times, but it's still the same. In addition, in the web 3D version, the color scale is displayed normally.

@petra-pik thank you! I've found it in the desktop version! And it would be even better if this function could be added to the Android app:-)

@Filip_K Now there is a missing update for 06Z in the point forecast...But the layer forecast did not.

@Yves70 thank you! But I didn't find it on my Android phone😂

@Filip_K Thank you and the Windy team: -)

In the Meteogram, the lowest Relative Humidity layer is 950hPa. Can we add a new 1000hPa RH layer at the bottom? The Relative Humidity of 1000hPa is important for low altitude plain areas, where heavy fog or very low stratiform clouds usually appear. However, I cannot see the clouds represented by this layer in the Meteogram.

@Suty In the new version, the 'Reference time' has also been lost, which is a very important data. I hope it can be restored.

As the title suggests, the compare forecasts in version 46, there is no longer a "reference time". The reference time of the weather model is very important for weather forecasters, especially in the comparison of different weather models. It is even more important to understand the reference time of each model before viewing the results of each weather model output, and we hope to be able to make a comeback!

I also noticed this change in version 46, which removed the display of clouds and precipitation in Airgram. It is very inconvenient for analyzing weather because it requires switching back and forth between Meteogram and Airgram. Sometimes there is no need to update just for the sake of updating something, and Airgram in version 45 is quite good.
In addition, I also noticed that the weather icon in the Meteogram in version 46 has become smaller, which may be some unnecessary changes as it looks less coordinated and aesthetically pleasing.

@Filip_K Nice to hear this, thank you again!

@Filip_K Thank you and the Windy team: -)

@Filip_K What you saw is correct, and I also noticed that the point forecast for reference time 2024-07-02T18:00:00Z has been updated normally. This is a strange bug... If the point forecast for 2024-07-03T06:00:00Z has not been updated in the future, I will continue to let you know.

@Filip_K Now there is a missing update for 06Z in the point forecast...But the layer forecast did not.

@Suty Another appearance... ECMWF and ICON models, layer forecast has been updated to 06Z, while point forecast is still 00Z. Can you know the reason for this? The layer forecast and point forecast are not synchronized, which is very confusing. This issue often appears these days.

The first hour seems to depend on the running time of the model. If the model runs from 00Z, the first hour is 01Z (If without crossing local time zero)

@idefix37 The point forecast starting from 06Z and 18Z has also been successfully updated today, and it seems to have returned to normal. I don't know what happened in the past two days.