Soo, all helpful so far.

But is there no help page that simply lists each of the symbols with their explanation?

It’s absurd that we have to post screen shots with annotated arrows on to ask about each.

Of course, I appreciate the time taken to reply, but the amount of time spent of responding to this thread could instead be spent creating the help page.

Just put that in the help contents list and place a link to it here and in the other thread on the topic.

What are these two: exactly and how are they different?

https://share.icloud.com/photos/0a14rq16cRcuT-UCFd7CgJc0g

@korina Thank you.

I refer you to my reply to Gkikas LGPZ just now.

Your two replies avoid addressing my question. It tells us that there are more important matters - I accept that - and mentions 3D - a very exciting prospect, I agree‼️

But please try to answer my question and please do so without using phases that simply make it clear wind chill is less important than other things. We get that; you say that regularly.

Instead, try completing this sentence by replacing ‘X’, ‘Y’ and ‘Z’ in the sentence:-

"Windy has ‘X’ number of projects ahead of Wind Chill on its roadmap. Windy expects to start work on wind chill in ‘Y’ months and aims to deliver wind chill as a temperature beside the current temperature data in the year ‘Z’.

Go on, ask the team and have a go at that. It’s good business practice to take this more positive and committing approach to roadmap creation. Let us know the outcome please.

Good luck with all your work. I only take the time to reply at such length here because your work is important to very many people and organisations.... Oh and I love the Vendée 🌈

@gkikas-lgpz Thanks for this reply.

Beware misinterpreting strict interpretation of moderator statements with scrupulous or nuanced analysis.

Perhaps you didn’t read my point that was being replied to.

Remember, if you did read it, that I had asked for Windy to let customers know where Wind Chill sits on your roadmap. The failure to address that in any way, opened the door to a scrupulous analysis of the what the vague reply means.

By reviewing all the threads on this topic and how Windy has responded, my headline becomes a plausible interpretation.

I’m impressed with your attention to my replies, provocative as you may feel them to be. I also respect that you haven’t excluded me.

It’s now time to stop telling us about other more important projects that are not the subject of this thread. Focus on a positive statement about wind chill.

Complete the thread with a more confident positive statement about when Wind Cill will be addressed.

Thank you 😀

@korina HaHa!

Its official: Windy considers Wind Chill unimportant.

I have a recollection you gave the same answer some time ago in a different thread on this topic - I haven’t bothered to check, as it was so long ago, so apologies if I’m incorrect.

That’s an astonishing miscalculation of user needs and desires, notwithstanding the frequency with which it is discussed here.

So, I simply don’t believe you, sorry.....

I prefer to believe that you have not consulted those in the organisation responsible for matching user needs to your development roadmap.

So, good luck with persuading not only your amateur users, but also your corporate clients that a Wind Chill layer is unimportant (or at least it’s inclusion as a thread beside the temperature data thread) 😂‼️

Anyway, thanks for replying and please take care and I hope all those that matter to you are able to do that as well 🌈

Thank you 😊

Because you've really said very little constructive here or in the other 'wind chill' threads, I'm posting the following.

It is noted that you have not given an indication of the delivery date for "wind chill".

It is also noted that your explanation of what is being prioritised ahead of "wind chill" lacks any information about what these bigger projects(s) might be or when they might be delivered.

Perhaps you could provide a link to the list of items that you have prioritised?

Or, perhaps you are keeping your plans secret?

I expect you know that protecting your ideas by keeping them secret does two things:--

1. It ensures your competitors don't know what you are up to, which is obviously why companies do this.

2. However, it also looses a proportion of your current and future customers. This is significant and perhaps neglected by Windy. The demographic of those lost is important to building your user-base over time.

The net outcome in the market you inhabit is that you end up with more customers over a production cycle if you reveal your plans.

Obviously, you keep the methodology for delivering your published engineering ideas secret - the 'how'. You can publish your plans without revealing your trade secrets.

There are markets in which this is not true, but they are not Windy's market.

Lastly, keeping quiet about Windy Maps was an example of a good decision (it's a new market and thus very different from a new addition to the well known original Windy).

Sorry if this has been mistaken for a rant 😉

@KORINA Why not? We all know it's not on your road map - so no need to tell us that again...

We want you to put it on your road map.

Then, we want you to use your road map to tell us when it will arrive.

And of course, the necessary formula to create a new "wind chill" layer is simple and uses the data we can already toggle for display.

OR.....

Since it's such a simple implementation, perhaps the most obvious explanation is that you have decided not to provide this.

In which case, the way to keep the support of those users who would like it would be to explain why you will not put it on your road map

@KORINA Why not? We all know it's not on your road map - so no need to tell us that again...

We want you to put it on your road map.

Then, we want you to use your road map to tell us when it will arrive.

And of course, the necessary formula to create a new "wind chill" layer is simple and uses the data we can already toggle for display.

OR.....

Since it's such a simple implementation, perhaps the most obvious explanation is that you have decided not to provide this.

In which case, the way to keep the support of those users who would like it would be to explain why you will not put it on your road map.

Brilliant App.

Beware over simplification.

There are many users who you have not heard from because they did not feel much change was needed.

You have a unique app that is informative, useful and 'fluid'.

Thank you from a user who doesn't like to moan about a free app (Trolls: I say that knowing a great deal about the mechanics and fiscal value of advertisements).