Bonjour,

In US, they use Heat Index, in french Canada (here I am), they use "Humidex", but when you work or sport in windy unshaded, clouded or not, upon sun angle conditions, I would prefer WBGT to determine the type of efforts I could do without exhaustion.

I webbed NOAA-National Weather Service (https://digital.mdl.nws.noaa.gov/) selecting WBGT display. I also webbed https://www.weather.gov/ict/WBGT, https://perryweather.com/2020/07/30/heat-index-wet-bulb-globe-temp/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet-bulb_globe_temperature.

I am convinced that your users would appreciate this kind of information.

Daniel

I would appreciate to have HRRR and ECMWF on the same display.
That would give, in a single look, the first 34 hours (or so) with best precision and display 5 days (or so) tendencies.

At a certain level of zoom, cities are not located at the right places, as per New York in Quebec province 8)

https://spectra-basic.ghgsat.com/

Bonjour,

In US, they use Heat Index, in french Canada (here I am), they use "Humidex", but when you work or sport in windy unshaded, clouded or not, upon sun angle conditions, I would prefer WBGT to determine the type of efforts I could do without exhaustion.

I webbed NOAA-National Weather Service (https://digital.mdl.nws.noaa.gov/) selecting WBGT display. I also webbed https://www.weather.gov/ict/WBGT, https://perryweather.com/2020/07/30/heat-index-wet-bulb-globe-temp/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet-bulb_globe_temperature.

I am convinced that your users would appreciate this kind of information.

Daniel

My question concerns CO overlay. Currently New York, Chicago, and some wildfires give red intensity.
Could we have indication of CO origin ? Like, pollution, wildfire, raffinerie, ...