I have face same issue on my client site.

I get why this feels frustrating—when people hear “radar future forecast,” they usually expect the same simple radar-animation prediction many weather apps show for free, but in Windy the “forecast models” listed (like ECMWF or GFS) are actually numerical weather models rather than direct radar-based future frames, which is probably why they appear confusing and not clickable in the way you expect. A clearer explanation inside the app would definitely help users understand the difference between model forecasts and radar extrapolation. I’ve seen similar discussions explained better on tech forums and guides like bstation, where users often break down how different apps label forecasting features and why the terminology can be misleading for everyday users.