@gkikas-lgpz
I think it is necessary to correct this definition of "mean waves heght" here too:

Best wishes

@korina thank you for your quick reply. Windy.com is an amazing tool for many many users from a wide range of uses. So that I think it is worthy to be accurate on using technical words. Note that, the "significant height" is the same as "mean wave height of the highest third of the waves". If you don´t want to use "significant wave height", it is not correct to substitute it just with "mean wave height". The true "mean wave height" is actually around 64% of the "significant height". . Best wishes.

@korina thank you very much for help improving Windy.com. I´m meteorologist and I´ve recently explainned to my instagram followers about this tricky details regarding waves height forecasts, citing Windy.com. My profile: @hashtag.ceu Best wishes.

@korina thank you very much for help improving Windy.com. I´m meteorologist and I´ve recently explainned to my instagram followers about this tricky details regarding waves height forecasts, citing Windy.com. My profile: @hashtag.ceu Best wishes.

@korina thank you for your quick reply. Windy.com is an amazing tool for many many users from a wide range of uses. So that I think it is worthy to be accurate on using technical words. Note that, the "significant height" is the same as "mean wave height of the highest third of the waves". If you don´t want to use "significant wave height", it is not correct to substitute it just with "mean wave height". The true "mean wave height" is actually around 64% of the "significant height". . Best wishes.

@gkikas-lgpz
I think it is necessary to correct this definition of "mean waves heght" here too:

Best wishes

prev-ciclone-24mai2019

https://www.windy.com/annotation/5ce7f87ba32367001914b108

This image is licenced under Creative Commons licence and can be used/modified freely in any possible way

Create your own annotation at https://www.windy.com/annotate

ciclogenese-24maio2019

https://www.windy.com/annotation/5ce7f773a32367001914b107

This image is licenced under Creative Commons licence and can be used/modified freely in any possible way

Create your own annotation at https://www.windy.com/annotate

A bug? Geopotential isolines do not change when a change the model, from ECMWF to GFS. It seems that ECMWF isolines are displayed whatever model you choose.