@radek-m, I agree that the legend's scale needs revisited. Much of the scale is spent distinguishing from 0 to 1.5 inches. It gets very difficult to distinguish between something a little over 1.5 inches and 36 inches. Is there a particular reason this was chosen? Windy's chosen scale may be useful to decide if I'll need to water my garden, but it is not very useful to help me decide if flooding will be an issue where I am. For that application, I need to see clearly where we may get 6", 12", 18", or 24".
K
Posts made by kapdma
-
RE: Rain accumulation map scale remains hard to readposted in Your Feedback and Suggestions
-
RE: Rain accumulationposted in Bug Reports
I had the same confusion as the OP. It would be more clear to use "36" rather than 3ft, since the units are in inches. I was confused with units of in on the far left and ft on the far right.