it should be fixed by now

@Ziggy59 @ibelimb @BillyR @rapier @WindCaller @jmh2002 thanks for reporting, it is a bug and will be solved shortly. see https://community.windy.com/topic/8663/delayed-radar-data for updates

hello @stevecrye, could you please specify which spot are you talking about?

@maila7 it is done now, data are being sourced directly from CHMI. however, if same alert applies for whole region, it is being grouped and shown as whole...

nice proposals @jmh2002 , thanks! it is not the priority now, but we plan to do some more work on Cap Alerts in the future. we will consider these proposals for sure.

but especially the "no data/no warning" visualisation would be pretty tricky to implement since the feeds are coming from various sources, where you cannot be sure what area they can cover. also, some feeds provide areas which are identified by an "area code", but have no other geographical information. if you don't have the database of these codes and their geographical representation (and that is the case from time to time), you have no chance to construct such visualisation...

@jidanni what you do with CTRL++ is a zoom in a browser. you can use still use that feature, but you have to access it from the browser menu, not by shortcut.

Hi all, it was a bug and it should be fixed by now. Thanks for reporting.

Hello @Slava-4 Thanks for notice, it should be fixed by now.

Hi @idefix37, there are multiple sources we use for buoys and ships, mostly those available at NOAA ftp. Taking a look at your example, one report can be found here https://tgftp.nws.noaa.gov/SL.us008001/DF.an/DC.sfmar/DS.ships/sn.0155.txt where the station is clearly identified as a ship (plus I cannot see id 41040 being reported anywhere else).

Aaccording to manual on codes buoys are identified as ZZYY, ships as BBXX.

Can you please comment on that, is there anything I am missing? or can you provide alternate data source where this buoy is properly identified?
thanks.