@korina just to be clear, the 50% threshold explains the appearance, but the choice to hide the full cloud bases data in that way is very un-ideal for pilots. Just because it's technically scattered instead of broken doesn't suddenly make it safe for me to plan an VFR flight at that altitude.

I understand it probably doesn't make sense to change an existing visualisation just for pilots, but a new visualization option would be extremely helpful - it's probably the main thing that Windy can't really help a pilot with at this point in time.

this is huge!! I am so excited, and also surprised you haven't made it a big announcement!

Thank you!

@nirvous yep, living in the States I'd love to have HRRR - it's even better than NAM

It's clear that there is data here, it's just not being displayed.

Refreshing the page doesn't help. I don't see anything obviously relevant in the web console.

this also happens in the mobile app:

in some cases it's just slightly annoying, but my brain can reconstruct the missing pieces. In others, it looks like there's probably a huge chunk missing, compared to what appears in the Low Clouds layer.

this is huge!! I am so excited, and also surprised you haven't made it a big announcement!

Thank you!

@korina just to be clear, the 50% threshold explains the appearance, but the choice to hide the full cloud bases data in that way is very un-ideal for pilots. Just because it's technically scattered instead of broken doesn't suddenly make it safe for me to plan an VFR flight at that altitude.

I understand it probably doesn't make sense to change an existing visualisation just for pilots, but a new visualization option would be extremely helpful - it's probably the main thing that Windy can't really help a pilot with at this point in time.

@nirvous yep, living in the States I'd love to have HRRR - it's even better than NAM

@gkikas-lgpz That's helpful context.

It would be ideal for me if this view could show the bases of the clouds rather than the okta-related ceilings. If I have OVC at 700 at Enterprise, there's no way I'm going flying over over Ozark even if it's technically SCT, because those same clouds are likely sitting near 700 anyway.

I'm sure for others this is perfect for them. I wonder how much effort would be involved in making Cloud bases display bases while adding a new Ceilings display with these block-by-block estimates of the cloud coverage. Personally, even splitting those into two separate overlays would work - cloud bases and cloud coverage are two separately interesting things.

@idefix37 I don't mean to be rude, but it seems clear to me that you didn't look at my screenshots. Taking a look just at the mobile app:

Look east and south of Memphis. There are obvious missing squares in that cloud front.

Look south of Lexington. There are obvious missing squares in the south east of KY.

Look at the A in South Carolina. Clearly missing data, not a lack of clouds.

Same thing with northern Florida. Also near New Orleans and out over the Gulf of Mexico.

In all of these places, there aren't "no clouds". There are definitely clouds, and for some reason the data isn't displaying them.

It's clear that there is data here, it's just not being displayed.

Refreshing the page doesn't help. I don't see anything obviously relevant in the web console.

this also happens in the mobile app:

in some cases it's just slightly annoying, but my brain can reconstruct the missing pieces. In others, it looks like there's probably a huge chunk missing, compared to what appears in the Low Clouds layer.